At the soundside edge of Topsail Island, a hole in the ground is not unusual. Marsh grass gives way to higher soil, fiddler crabs disappear when footsteps approach, and small brown crabs move beneath boards, leaves, and anything else that holds a little shade. A burrow at the edge of a coastal yard may belong to an animal that has lived along this shore far longer than the yard has.
That is why a hole alone would be poor evidence of a blue land crab.
The animal itself would be harder to overlook. A mature blue land crab, Cardisoma guanhumi, can grow to nearly six inches across its shell, with legs that make it appear larger still. An adult male is often blue-gray and carries one powerful claw, but females may be pale gray or white, while younger crabs can be orange, brown, or purple. From a distance, the uneven claws can resemble those of a fiddler crab, except the entire animal has been enlarged to a scale unfamiliar in a Carolina backyard (Hostetler et al., 2025).
Until recently, it was also unfamiliar along this part of the coast. The blue land crab’s historically documented range in the continental United States followed the Gulf of Mexico and southern Florida, with Vero Beach long recognized as its northern Atlantic limit (Scott et al., 2023). Occasional South Carolina records began in 2008, followed by 53 verified sightings there during a concentrated period of public reporting in fall 2022 (Scott et al., 2023). North Carolina confirmed its first blue land crab in summer 2023. By August 2026, 23 sightings had been confirmed statewide and another 34 reports remained unverified. Two of the confirmed records this year came from Emerald Isle (NC DEQ, 2026).
Those numbers do not yet describe a population. They describe a question appearing in yards, along roads, and beside the marsh: whether a warm-water crab is occasionally reaching North Carolina or beginning to live here.
A Crab That Does Not Stay in One World
The blue land crab is neither a displaced Atlantic blue crab nor simply a giant fiddler. The shared color and oversized claw describe what it looks like, not its closest relatives. It belongs to Gecarcinidae, the land-crab family, whose members have moved much of adult life above the tide. Their gills still do the breathing, even in air, and those gills must remain damp. The crab can leave the water; it cannot leave water behind (Marin & Tiunov, 2023).
That need for moisture keeps the crab between two worlds. Adults may live above the reach of ordinary tides—in coastal forests, brushy ground, grasslands, drainage edges, and even yards—but they return to damp shelter when the day becomes hot or when a newly molted shell leaves them vulnerable. Many blue land crabs can live near one another without sharing that refuge; each normally keeps a burrow of its own (Herreid & Gifford, 1963; Moraes-Costa & Schwamborn, 2018).
That higher position separates the blue land crab from many crabs living in the flooded marsh below it, but not completely. Its life still returns to the estuary. After mating, a female carries hundreds of thousands of eggs beneath her abdomen and travels to salt or brackish water to release them (Hostetler et al., 2025). The larvae drift through several planktonic stages before settling and returning to land as small crabs. Warm water is particularly important during this development, while salinity determines which parts of an estuary can carry the larvae successfully (Costlow & Bookhout, 1968a, 1968b).
An adult can therefore live beneath shrubs beside a yard while its offspring begin among fishes and plankton. The species belongs to the coastal upland and the estuary at the same time, and that divided life helps explain how an animal tied to one burrow can appear far beyond the range where its adults were previously known.
How a Southern Crab Reached This Shore
Blue land crabs are not likely to have walked from Florida to the Carolinas. Adults forage close to their burrows and show strong attachment to a small home area. Females make longer reproductive movements toward water, but those are local journeys between upland burrows and larval-release sites rather than migrations along hundreds of miles of coastline (Moraes-Costa & Schwamborn, 2018).
Long-distance movement is more plausible during the larval stage. Once released, larvae spend weeks in coastal water before returning to land, allowing currents to carry them beyond the place where they hatched (Hostetler et al., 2023). A widening pattern of sightings from Florida through Georgia and South Carolina would be consistent with natural range expansion as warming water and milder cold periods make northern development and survival more possible (Costlow & Bookhout, 1968b; NC DEQ, 2026; Scott et al., 2023). Human transport, including movement with vessels or materials, remains another possibility because the present records do not yet reveal how the crabs arrived (NC DEQ, 2026).
Warmer conditions in Florida would not simply make the crabs decide to leave. The more relevant change would occur at the northern boundary, where conditions that once killed larvae or prevented overwintering may no longer do so as reliably (Costlow & Bookhout, 1968b). Warming can open habitat ahead of a species without pushing adults out of the habitat behind it.
It is tempting to imagine worsening conditions in Florida sending blue land crabs north, but that does not fit particularly well with how the adults live. Coastal development, altered groundwater, harvesting, and the loss of mangrove-edge habitat have reduced populations in parts of Puerto Rico and Brazil. When the ground around an adult’s burrow is destroyed, however, the crab may move only a short distance or disappear with the habitat. It does not begin a walk to North Carolina (Govender et al., 2008; Moraes-Costa & Schwamborn, 2018).
Development may matter after the much smaller, drifting stage has already reached a new shore. A canal edge, drainage ditch, watered lawn, or patch of coastal vegetation can offer the damp ground a young crab needs as it leaves the estuary. Human-altered places may therefore help connect suitable patches without being the reason the crab traveled north in the first place (Riascos et al., 2024).
So is the blue land crab native to North Carolina, or is it invasive? Neither label fits neatly yet. The species is native to warmer parts of the western Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico, including Florida, but North Carolina lies beyond its historically recognized Atlantic range in the United States. If larvae are reaching the Carolinas on coastal currents and surviving because conditions have become more favorable, then the crab’s natural range may be expanding. If crabs arrived with boats or transported materials, that would be an introduction. The sightings cannot yet tell us which occurred (Scott et al., 2023; NC DEQ, 2026).
Either way, arrival alone does not make a species invasive. The blue land crab would have to establish a reproducing population, continue spreading, and cause ecological or economic harm. North Carolina has confirmed crabs, but it does not yet have evidence of an established, harmful population (NC DEQ, 2026).
Emerald Isle Is Not Far Away
There were two confirmed blue land crab sightings in Emerald Isle this year, out of 23 confirmed cases across North Carolina (NC DEQ, 2026). This is what makes the Emerald Isle records matter here. The confirmed crabs were not found along some distant part of the North Carolina coast. They were found on Bogue Banks, northeast of Onslow County and only several dozen coastal miles from North Topsail Beach.
Between Emerald Isle and Topsail are connected sounds, tidal creeks, inlets, marshes, developed islands, and the Intracoastal Waterway. A crab confirmed on Bogue Banks does not prove that one is already living around North Topsail, Surf City, or the soundside of Topsail Island. It does place the animal within a coastal landscape that continues toward all three.
That does not mean currents are carrying crabs neatly from Emerald Isle toward Topsail, and the statewide sightings should not be read as a marching line. Some animals may represent separate arrivals; others may have gone unnoticed for years. The map brings the question closer. Only repeated observations can show where the crab has actually found a place—and which members of the existing crab community are already there.
The Crabs Already Here
Onslow County’s marsh edge is not waiting empty for a land crab to arrive. Several native crabs divide the same transition from tidal creek to high ground, although each uses a somewhat different part of it.
Comparison of the blue land crab to other crabs seen in our Onslow County area. | Image credit: SC Department of Natural Resources
At low tide, the easiest to notice are often fiddlers. Atlantic marsh fiddler crabs,Minuca pugnax, favor muddier marsh sediment, while Atlantic sand fiddlers,Leptuca pugilator, are more common across sandy flats and the higher portions of the marsh. Red-jointed fiddler crabs,Minuca minax, appear where the water is fresher. Marsh and sand fiddlers have long been documented in North Carolina salt marshes, gathering into the familiar patches that vanish into small holes when a person approaches (O’Connor, 1993).
They sift algae, microbes, and bits of organic material from the surface, leaving tiny feeding marks across exposed sediment. Even a male carrying an oversized claw has a body only a fraction of the width of an adult blue land crab.
Closer to the cordgrass, purple marsh crabs,Sesarma reticulatum, move along muddy creek banks and feed heavily on the grass, including stems and tissues belowground. At ordinary numbers they are part of the marsh’s long-established community. Where their numbers become unusually high, their feeding can strip away vegetation and leave sediment exposed (Bertness et al., 2014; Wittyngham et al., 2024).
At the upper edge, the small brown crab beneath a board or patch of leaves may be a squareback marsh crab,Armases cinereum. Of the native crabs, it is the most likely to meet a blue land crab where marsh gives way to the yard. It moves above the high-water line, sometimes crossing lawns or climbing garage walls, and eats fallen leaves, living plants, and small invertebrates. Its menu is broad in much the same way as a blue land crab’s, although the squareback itself is far smaller (Buck et al., 2003).
Other familiar crabs belong to neighboring settings. Atlantic mud crabs such as Panopeus herbstii remain among oyster shells, rocks, and submerged structure, where their heavy claws open oysters, clams, barnacles, and snails. Ghost crabs,Ocypode quadrata, occupy the open beach and dune sand on the ocean side. Either may be close in geographic distance to a blue land crab, but neither uses the soundside grass-to-yard boundary in quite the same way.
Each of these crabs already belongs to a particular part of the shore. A blue land crab would not arrive in an empty niche, but it would not duplicate any one of them either. To see where the differences matter, we have to look below the opening.
The Architecture Beneath the Opening
For a burrowing crab, the tunnel is more than a hiding place. It is a shelter from heat and predators, a humid chamber that protects the gills, and a safe place to molt. Its shape reflects the problem the crab needs it to solve, which is why burrows built only a few yards apart can belong to very different lives.
A blue land crab begins on higher ground with a comparatively broad entrance, then turns downward toward moisture. There is no single blueprint hidden below it. Burrows examined with a fiber-optic camera in Puerto Rico included short passages that descended at a shallow angle, longer tunnels that leveled before dropping sharply, and deep curves resembling an inverted S. Forked and corkscrew forms occurred less often. The route varied with the site, but the essential destination was usually the same: a humid refuge at or near groundwater, occupied by one crab rather than a colony sharing one chamber (Moraes-Costa & Schwamborn, 2018; Sample & Albrecht, 2016).
The blue land crab’s burrow will begin their entrance with a steep angle that levels off until a sharp downward turn to reach the water table. | Image credit: Sample & Albrecht, 2016
An Atlantic sand fiddler builds at another scale and for another rhythm. Its narrow shaft descends through sand exposed between tides, and a deeper breeding burrow may extend farther than the temporary refuge used while feeding. Across a flat, many small entrances can stand close together because each belongs to a small crab defending little more than the ground immediately around it. Although the shafts provide shelter and moist air, they remain much narrower than the passage required by an adult blue land crab (Christy, 1982). A fiddler opening would therefore be a poor ready-made home for a mature Cardisoma.
A 3D cast and schematic show the burrow formation of an Atlantic fiddler crab. | Image Credit: di Virgilio & Riberio, 2013
The purple marsh crab offers a different contrast. Its burrows occupy muddy, rooted creek banks and can become part of a connected network with several openings. When those networks become dense, especially where vegetation has already thinned, excavation and cordgrass feeding can loosen the bank and make sediment easier for moving water to carry away (Bertness et al., 2014; Farron et al., 2020). A blue land crab generally begins above ordinary tidal flooding and maintains a more solitary route toward groundwater. Its burrow should not be assumed to undercut a creek bank in the same way simply because both animals dig.
A ghost crab may also leave one obvious opening and a mound of newly moved sand, but its address is usually the open ocean beach or foredune. Its sloping or curving refuge is built in loose, comparatively dry beach sand, not at the moist soundside boundary between marsh and yard.
Ghost crab burrow structure from a 3D cast on a sandy beach | Image credit: Shinoda et al., 2019
The squareback marsh crab makes an even clearer distinction. It commonly slips beneath leaves, logs, rocks, boards, and other cover at the upper marsh edge instead of constructing the large groundwater-reaching tunnel associated with an adult blue land crab. Mud crabs and Atlantic blue crabs do not make permanent terrestrial burrows at all. One uses submerged crevices; the other may bury itself temporarily in bottom sediment.
The squareback marsh crab may use rocks, leaves or other surface materials to hide beneath instead of a burrow. | Image credit: critterbliss, iNaturalist
Burrow reuse deserves equal care. Smaller blue land crabs have been found in openings much larger than their bodies, which is consistent with their moving into burrows abandoned by larger blue land crabs (Carmona-Suárez & Guerra-Castro, 2012). For a smaller crab, an empty tunnel would mean less digging, less time exposed aboveground, and immediate access to a refuge that already holds moisture. Those are likely advantages rather than benefits tested directly.
The other crabs along a Carolina shore do not appear to offer the same shortcut. Their shelters are too narrow, too low in the marsh, too dry, or not true burrows at all. Nothing currently shows that blue land crabs routinely take over and enlarge the burrows of another crab species.
The digging leaves more than a hole. Soil brought up from below is spread across the surface, while leaves, scraps of food, old molts, and waste may collect inside. In places where blue land crabs are established, the soil within their burrows differs from the ground beside them in its mixture of sand and silt, acidity, organic matter, and nutrients including nitrogen, magnesium, and potassium (Quintero-Torres et al., 2018).
The open tunnel also allows air and water to reach soil that had been sealed underground. Across many kinds of coastal crabs, burrowing tends to loosen sediment and change the chemical work carried out there by microbes. How much changes—and whether the effect helps or harms the plants above—depends upon the crab, the vegetation, and where the burrow sits (Rinehart et al., 2024).
Water salinity is shown in a burrowed marsh (a), a straight burrowed marsh (b), a sloped marsh (c ), and a marsh at the high tide stage and how salinity is distributed in the marsh as influenced by burrows. | Image credit: Yin et al., 2023
That does not mean each hole ventilates an entire marsh. Oxygen entering a tunnel may change only a thin layer of soil along its walls. Around fiddler burrows, that reach has been far smaller than the familiar phrase “aerates the soil” might suggest (Michaels & Zieman, 2013). A single high-ground blue land crab tunnel is not a new tidal creek either. Rain, groundwater, or an unusually high tide may enter it and change the wetness immediately around the opening, but blue land crab burrows have not been shown to redirect tidal flow through a maritime forest.
Roots present the same uncertainty. Digging can break fine roots and loosen the soil holding them, while the extra space and shifted nutrients around a tunnel may create new conditions for roots and soil life. Blue land crabs also clip and eat plants aboveground, so a damaged plant would not tell us whether feeding, digging, or both were responsible.
One occupied hole may change little beyond a small patch of ground. If the same digging were repeated across many burrows, those patches could begin to influence which plants take hold, how firmly their roots bind the edge, and how water moves through the soil. That possibility is one reason burrows are worth mapping. It is not evidence that those changes are already happening at North Carolina sighting sites.
At first, the tunnel keeps one crab alive. Only when that work is repeated across a place does it begin to become part of the landscape.
From the surface, however, most of that architecture remains hidden.
What a Burrow Can—and Cannot—Tell Us
A mature blue land crab may leave an opening three to five inches wide. Freshly excavated soil may collect around the entrance, and plant pieces or tracks may be visible nearby. These clues become more persuasive when the hole sits above normal tidal flooding in shaded, moist ground and a very large crab has been seen retreating into it (Hostetler et al., 2025).
It is still not an identification. A smaller blue land crab may occupy an older, larger burrow, while erosion can widen the entrance to a much smaller tunnel. Marsh soil also collapses, roots leave openings, rodents dig, and water continually reshapes the grass line. Size alone can mislead, particularly in a photograph with nothing nearby for scale.
The setting and the pattern offer better clues. Many small holes spread across exposed mud or sand point toward fiddlers. Several openings cut through a rooted creek bank fit purple marsh crabs. One hole high on the dry ocean beach is more likely a ghost crab’s. Squarebacks are often found beneath something rather than beside a large mound of freshly dug soil. The strongest match for the blue land crab would bring several details together: a broad opening on higher soundside ground, signs of recent digging, and a crab far larger than the native marsh species.
That is why a useful photograph includes more than the hole. The crab, entrance, moved soil, surrounding plants, nearby water, and something familiar for scale allow the scene to be read together. There is no need to dig, probe, or flood the tunnel. Without the animal, a burrow can identify a place worth watching, but not the species living beneath it.
What the New Crab Would Eat
The large claw may make a blue land crab look like a hunter arriving to eat every smaller crab in its path. Most of what it gathers, however, is plant material: fallen leaves, fruit, berries, flowers, tender shoots, grasses, and seeds. It may carry that food home and pull some of it underground. Insects, carrion, feces, and other animal matter add to the diet when available, and blue land crabs sometimes eat one another (Gifford, 1962; Herreid, 1963; Moraes-Costa & Schwamborn, 2018).
That does not place native crabs entirely off the menu. A blue land crab may seize a small animal it can catch, but regular hunting of fiddlers, squarebacks, or purple marsh crabs is unlikely to be its main influence. The more important changes would probably begin with the plants and fallen leaves it removes, the ground it excavates, and the space it keeps around its burrow.
The amount of competition would differ from crab to crab. Fiddlers graze the thin film of algae, microbes, and organic particles coating the marsh surface, so they share relatively little food with a crab gathering fruit and leaves above the high-tide line. Squareback and purple marsh crabs share more of that plant-based menu, although they forage at different scales and in different parts of the marsh. If blue land crabs remain, the strongest overlap may be over shaded ground, damp refuge, and nearby plant food rather than over a particular prey animal.
What Established Populations Tell Us
Sharing food and high ground does not make displacement inevitable. Where blue land crabs have lived for generations, other crabs continue to live beside them by using different levels of the shore. Along the Brazilian coast, for example, the mangrove crab,Ucides cordatus, digs into softer ground between the tides, while Cardisoma lives higher in firmer, sandier soil. Their ranges overlap without their burrows occupying precisely the same ground (Firmo et al., 2012).
North Carolina has a different community, but the same separation by water, soil, and elevation is already familiar here. The squareback comes closest to overlapping with a blue land crab at the upper edge. Even there, one defended Cardisoma burrow might cost a squareback a feeding spot without removing squarebacks from the wider marsh.
The first change people noticed might therefore be simpler than one crab replacing another: a much larger animal at the grass line, fresh soil beside an entrance, fallen fruit or leaves drawn toward it, and tender plants clipped within a short walk of the burrow.
That picture could change if the crabs became numerous. Many defended burrows would divide more of the narrow band of damp high ground, increasing competition for shelter and food. Their digging would repeat the small soil changes described above, while their feeding could influence which seeds and seedlings survive and how quickly fallen leaves disappear. Those broader forest effects are known across several land-crab species rather than from a newly established Cardisoma population, but they show why abundance matters more than the mere arrival of one large crab (Lindquist et al., 2009).
Predators would respond only if the crabs became dependable prey. Large birds and mammals eat blue land crabs within their established range, while eggs and larvae released into the estuary become food for aquatic animals (Firmo et al., 2012; Hostetler et al., 2025). One adult crossing a Carolina yard offers one unusual meal. A recurring population could give raccoons or coastal birds a reason to search the marsh edge and could place many larvae into the estuarine food web.
This is where two kinds of change can look like the same thing. Digging alters the ground directly, making the crab an ecosystem engineer (Rinehart et al., 2024). A trophic cascade would have to continue through feeding relationships: fewer surviving seedlings changing the vegetation, for example, or predators drawn to land crabs changing their pressure on other prey (Lindquist et al., 2009).
Blue land crabs are capable of beginning both pathways. What the North Carolina sightings cannot yet tell us is whether enough crabs are arriving, surviving, and reproducing for the work of individuals to become the work of a population.
When One Sighting Becomes a Place
One dated photograph gives the map a place. Another observation weeks or months later begins to show whether the crab stayed. As those records accumulate, they can reveal when the crabs are active, whether they appear after rain, which kinds of ground they use, and whether they return across seasons. Crabs of different sizes at one site may have survived across more than one year, while juveniles, egg-bearing females, or repeated movements toward the water would offer stronger evidence that the species is completing more of its life cycle here.
The same map can show where the larger ecological questions belong. One wandering adult does not tell us that native crabs are being displaced or that a trophic cascade has begun. Several occupied burrows, plant damage, younger crabs, and repeated sightings at the same place would give biologists a reason to compare its vegetation, soil, native crabs, and predators with nearby places where Cardisoma is absent.
Anyone who sees a possible blue land crab can photograph it from a safe distance and submit the image, date, and location through the Blue Land Crab Sightings reporting. A photograph showing the animal, its approximate scale, and the surrounding habitat is more useful than trying to catch or relocate it.
That distinction matters for anyone standing at the grass line. A three-inch hole is not an identification, clipped leaves are not proof of ecological harm, and a large crab is not automatically an invasive species. Each is a piece of context. Together, photographed and reported without catching or relocating the animal, those pieces can show whether North Carolina is receiving occasional southern visitors or adding a new resident to the narrow landscape between the forest and the sea.
The coast will answer that slowly, one place at a time.
References
Bertness, M. D., Brisson, C. P., Bevil, M. C., & Crotty, S. M. (2014). Herbivory drives the spread of salt marsh die-off. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e92916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092916
Buck, T. L., Breed, G. A., Pennings, S. C., Chase, M. E., Zimmer, M., & Carefoot, T. H. (2003). Diet choice in an omnivorous salt-marsh crab: Different food types, body size, and habitat complexity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 292(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0981(03)00146-1
Carmona-Suárez, C. A., & Guerra-Castro, E. (2015). Comparison of three quick methods to estimate crab size in the land crabs <i>Cardisoma guanhumi</i> Latreille, 1825 and <i>Ucides cordatus</i> (Crustacea: Brachyura: Gecarcinidae and Ucididae). Revista de Biología Tropical, 60, 139. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v60i0.19854
Costlow, Jr., J. D., & Bookhout, C. G. (1968a). The complete larval development of the land-crab, Cardisoma guanhumi Latreille in the laboratory (Brachyura, Gecarcinidae). Crustaceana, 15(3), 259-270.
Costlow, Jr., J. D., & Bookhout, C. G. (1968b). The effect of environmental factors on development of the land-grab,cardisoma guanhumiLatreille. American Zoologist, 8(3), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/8.3.399
Farron, S., Hughes, Z., FitzGerald, D., & Strom, K. (2020). The impacts of bioturbation by common marsh crabs on sediment erodibility: A laboratory flume investigation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 238, 106710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106710
Firmo, A., Tognella, M. M., Silva, S. R., Barboza, R. R., & Alves, R. (2012). Capture and commercialization of blue land crabs (“guaiamum”) Cardisoma guanhumi (Lattreille, 1825) along the coast of Bahia state, Brazil: An ethnoecological approach. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-12
Gifford, C. A. (1962). Some observations on the general biology of the land crab, cardisoma guanhumi (Latreille), in South Florida. The Biological Bulletin, 123(1), 207-223. https://doi.org/10.2307/1539516
Govender, Y., Sabat, A. M., & Cuevas, E. (2008). Effects of land-use/land-cover changes on land crab,Cardisoma guanhumi, abundance in Puerto Rico. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 24(4), 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467408005130
Herreid, C. F. (1963). Observations on the feeding behavior of Cardisoma Guanhumi (Latreille) in southern Florida1). Crustaceana, 5(3), 176-180. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854063×00093
Herreid, C. F., & Gifford, C. A. (1963). The burrow habitat of the land crab, Cardisoma guanhumi (Latreille). Ecology, 44(4), 773-775. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933027
Hostetler, M. E., Mazzottii, F. J., & Taylor, A. K. (2025, October 28). Blue land crab (Cardisoma guanhumi) (WEC 30). Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, UF/IFAS Extension. https://ask.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/UW013
Lindquist, E. S., Krauss, K. W., Green, P. T., O’Dowd, D. J., Sherman, P. M., & Smith, T. J. (2009). Land crabs as key drivers in tropical coastal forest recruitment. Biological Reviews, 84(2), 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.2008.00070.x
Marin, I. N., & Tiunov, A. V. (2023). Terrestrial crustaceans (Arthropoda, crustacea): Taxonomic diversity, terrestrial adaptations, and ecological functions. ZooKeys, 1169, 95-162. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1169.97812
Michaels, R. E., & Zieman, J. C. (2013). Fiddler crab (Uca spp.) burrows have little effect on surrounding sediment oxygen concentrations. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 448, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.06.020
Moraes-Costa, D., & Schwamborn, R. (2018). Site fidelity and population structure of blue land crabs (Cardisoma guanhumi Latreille, 1825) in a restricted-access mangrove area, analyzed using PIT tags. Helgoland Marine Research, 72(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10152-017-0504-0
O’Connor, N. (1993). Settlement and recruitment of the fiddler crabs Uca pugnax and U. pugilator in a North Carolina, USA; salt marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 93, 227-234. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps093227
Quintero-Torres, E., Chacón, N., & López-Sánchez, B. (2018). The ecosystem engineering role of the neotropical crab Cardisoma guanhumi on mangrove soil properties. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 26(5), 993-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-018-9618-7
Riascos, J. M., Obonaga, L. D., & Ramos, J. (2024). Is the threatened land crab Cardisoma guanhumi conquering human‐dominated systems? Ecology and Evolution, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10737
Rinehart, S. A., Dybiec, J. M., Walker, J. B., Simpson, L., & Cherry, J. A. (2024). Effects of burrowing crabs on coastal sediments and their functions: A systematic meta‐analysis. Ecosphere, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4927
Sample, S., & Albrecht, M. (2016). Determination of the burrow shapes of Cardisoma guanhumi on Vieques, Puerto Rico. Journal of Coastal Life Medicine, 4(2), 94-97. https://doi.org/10.12980/jclm.4.2016j5-245
Scott, E., Kendrick, M., Kingsley-Smith, P., James, M., Lemeris, J., Weeks, E., & Sasson, D. (2023). Using public sightings to document the widespread distribution of the non-endemic blue land crab, Cardisoma guanhumi, in South Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1656/058.022.0403
Wittyngham, S. S., Johnson, D. S., Chen, Y., & Kirwan, M. L. (2024). A grazing crab drives saltmarsh carbon storage and recovery. Ecology, 105(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.4385
Late August does not look much like fall along the Onslow County coast.
The sand is still hot. Afternoon thunderstorms still build over the mainland. The ocean can remain warm enough that stepping into it hardly feels like relief.
But beneath the surface, fall has already begun.
Fish that spent summer scattered through sounds, creeks, reefs, and nearshore water begin gathering. Shrimp start working their way out of nursery creeks. Mature female blue crabs move toward saltier water. Schools of mullet begin appearing along the beaches. Sharks that spent the warmer months farther north or inside coastal waters begin shifting south or offshore.
Above them, the birds begin changing too.
Some are preparing to leave. Others are arriving from places hundreds or thousands of miles away. Still others simply become more noticeable because suddenly there is food everywhere.
What looks from shore like a few gulls working over the water, a school of baitfish flashing beside a pier, or pelicans repeatedly diving beyond the breakers is part of something much larger.
For a few months each fall, the food web itself begins to move.
When the Water Begins to Change
Animals do not wait for a date on the calendar. Along the coast, fall arrives through changes in water temperature and daylight, but also through salinity, currents, rainfall, food availability, and the timing of reproduction. Different species respond to different combinations of those signals, which means the seasonal movement beginning beneath the surface is not one migration triggered in one way.
For some animals, cooling water begins narrowing where they can comfortably remain. King mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) favor warm coastal water and become less common as temperatures fall much below about 68°F, while cobia (Rachycentron canadum) begin leaving northern summer habitats as water cools through roughly the same range. Spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) respond differently. Rather than leaving our estuaries altogether, they begin shifting toward creeks, channels, and deeper water where a few additional feet of depth can provide protection from the colder temperatures still to come (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2022; Jensen & Graves, 2020; Ellis, Buckel, & Hightower, 2017; Ellis, Buckel, Hightower, & Poland, 2017).
King mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla), a warm-water coastal fish that becomes less common as fall temperatures drop. | Image credit: Sylvain Le Bris, iNaturalist
Temperature can work together with another signal that changes every year whether the weather feels like fall or not: shortening daylight. Blacktip and sandbar sharks moving along the western Atlantic begin their southward migration as sea-surface temperatures change and the days grow shorter, leaving northern and Mid-Atlantic summer habitats and gradually shifting toward the South Atlantic Bight and Florida for winter and spring (Manz et al., 2025).
For other animals, autumn movement is tied less to escaping cooling water than to reaching the next stage of their life cycle. Southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma) spend their first years in estuarine waters, where shallow sounds, rivers, and creeks provide nursery and feeding habitat. Females begin maturing surprisingly early: some are reproductively mature by age one, most by age two, and nearly all by age three. Immature fish can remain within the estuary through winter, but once mature, southern flounder begin joining the fall movement through the inlets and toward offshore spawning grounds (Midway & Scharf, 2012; Craig et al., 2015).
That means fish of different ages can occupy the same estuary through summer and then take different paths as fall develops. A young flounder may remain behind while an older fish that spent the season feeding in the same system begins moving toward the ocean.
So while late-August water may still feel thoroughly summerlike to someone standing waist-deep at Topsail, the animals beneath the surface are already responding to a season that is only beginning to become visible above it.
One of the first clues may simply be a fish jumping beside you.
The Mullet Begin to Run
Striped, or sea, mullet (Mugil cephalus) spend much of the warmer season feeding throughout estuaries, sounds, tidal creeks, and protected coastal waters. By late summer, however, their movements begin to change. In North Carolina, striped mullet travel most actively between August and November as mature fish leave rivers, sounds, and tidal creeks for marine spawning habitat. Their journey carries them through the inlets and offshore into the South Atlantic Bight, with spawning habitat extending from nearshore waters toward the outer continental shelf where shelf water meets the influence of the Gulf Stream (Bacheler et al., 2005). For fish that spent the summer inside an estuary, that is a considerable change in geography, but still a relatively regional migration compared with species that will later continue much farther south along the Atlantic coast.
They begin making that seasonal journey relatively young. About half of North Carolina striped mullet are reproductively mature by age one, although maturity varies among individuals, and older adults may return to estuarine habitats after spawning. Rather than leaving the estuary permanently as they mature, they move between estuarine feeding grounds and marine spawning habitat as part of a seasonal cycle (Bichy, 2004; Bacheler et al., 2005).
For beachgoers, this can become one of the easiest fall migrations to notice. Fish that spent summer spread through rivers, creeks, and sounds begin collecting into increasingly conspicuous schools as they move toward inlets and coastal water. Once along the ocean beach, dense schools may travel remarkably close to shore, sometimes darkening the shallows or stretching along the surf zone beyond what can be seen from one spot. Mullet are frequent jumpers as well, so a school may first reveal itself as silver fish repeatedly breaking the surface. By the time those schools reach the inlet and beach, they are carrying more than themselves with them. Striped mullet feed low in the food web, consuming algae, detritus, and organic material associated with estuarine sediments. As thousands of them move out of the estuary, that stored production moves with them and becomes available to the larger fishes, sharks, and birds that feed along the coast (Bacheler et al., 2005).
Those predators are already moving through the same corridor. Bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) feed heavily on schooling fishes such as mullet, menhaden, and silversides. Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) work schools of anchovies and other small baitfish, while blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) and spinner sharks (Carcharhinus brevipinna) take advantage of dense concentrations of coastal prey.
The fall mullet run is therefore more than thousands of fish leaving an estuary. It is estuarine production moving through the inlet and onto the beach, where it begins to intersect with predators following their own seasonal routes.
That intersection is what makes the migration suddenly visible. A school that might otherwise pass unnoticed can tighten near shore as bluefish, mackerel, sharks, and birds begin responding to the same moving concentration of prey.
Spanish Mackerel, Bluefish, and the Surface Chase
Sometimes the easiest way to find a migration is not to look for the animals themselves, but for what happens to the water when they arrive.
Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) spend the warmer months moving north along the Atlantic coast, reaching North Carolina in spring and remaining through summer and early fall while coastal water stays above roughly 68°F. As that warm-water window begins closing, they turn south again toward winter habitat off Florida, feeding heavily along the way on anchovies, silversides, menhaden, mullet, and other small schooling fishes (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2026; Sutherland & Fable, 1980).
Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) traveling in a dense school. | Image credit: Shutterstock
Bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) are moving through the same changing coast, but their fall pattern varies with age. Smaller bluefish tend to migrate south along the shoreline as water cools, while larger adults make more of an inshore-to-offshore shift. Farther north, fall movement begins as water drops into roughly the mid-50s Fahrenheit, gradually carrying fish into the warmer coastal waters to the south (Lund & Maltezos, 1970). By the time those movements reach the Carolina coast, they are crossing water already crowded with prey. Anchovies, silversides, juvenile menhaden, and other tiny schooling fishes—many of the fishes beachgoers collectively call “glass minnows”—can become compressed near the surface, and even wash onto shore, as mackerel and bluefish strike through the schools from below.
Little tunny (Euthynnus alletteratus), better known locally as false albacore, can join that fall activity around inlets and nearshore waters as well. They too make seasonal movements along the Atlantic coast, shifting north through the warmer part of the year and south again through fall and winter while feeding in fast-moving schools (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2026).
Little tunny (Euthynnus alletteratus), also known as false albacore, moving in a feeding school. | Image credit: aurelpap, iNaturalist
From the beach, separating one predator from another may be nearly impossible. What becomes visible instead is the chase. A patch of otherwise smooth ocean suddenly begins to boil as tiny fish scatter across the surface. Gulls and terns converge overhead, pelicans turn toward the commotion, and dark backs or silver flashes cut through the school below.
Sometimes the entire event moves several hundred yards down the beach within minutes.
And the animals doing the chasing are still part of the food web themselves. Spanish mackerel and bluefish may be predators here, but both can become prey for larger sharks and tunas farther up the same moving chain. A small fish feeding on plankton becomes food for a mackerel; that mackerel may later become food for a shark.
Fall has compressed several levels of the food web into the same patch of water, and for a few minutes the whole thing becomes visible from shore.
The Sharks Following Fall
Shark migration can sound dramatic because sharks are dramatic animals.
Ecologically, however, their fall movements make perfect sense. Food is moving, water temperature is changing, nursery seasons are ending, and remaining in shallow water becomes increasingly expensive for animals whose body temperature largely follows the environment around them.
Blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) and spinner sharks (Carcharhinus brevipinna) are warm-water coastal sharks frequently associated with schools of mullet, menhaden, and other fishes.
Blacktip (Carcharhinus limbatus) and spinner sharks (Carcharhinus brevipinna) can look very similar; fin markings and body proportions help separate the two. | Image credit: Bowers & Kaijiura, 2023
As coastal waters cool, these highly mobile sharks begin shifting south. For blacktips, that can mean a substantial journey: sharks that spent the warmer months along the Carolinas and farther north move down the Atlantic coast toward Florida, with large winter aggregations forming in the warm coastal waters of southeast Florida. Spinner sharks also shift south as autumn progresses, although exactly how their seasonal routes connect Carolina summer habitat with winter habitat farther south is less clearly understood (Manz et al., 2025). Their movement is not caused by prey alone. Temperature and the gradually shortening length of the day contribute to the timing of autumn migration, while concentrations of prey can influence where sharks pause and feed along the route (Manz et al., 2025). That shortening daylight is the actual span between sunrise and sunset—not the hour shown on our clocks. The gradual loss of daylight from late summer into fall provides a predictable seasonal signal even when water temperatures vary from one year to the next.
The shallow coastal habitats these sharks use during migration are also important much earlier in life. Blacktip pups are born in protected nursery areas away from most adults, and young sharks can remain associated with shallow coastal habitat for several years as they grow. Males generally reach maturity around four to five years old, while females mature closer to six or seven; spinner sharks follow a similarly slow timetable, with females maturing later than males (Carlson et al., 2006; NOAA Fisheries, 2017).
That means the shallow water along the coast is not simply a birthplace young sharks immediately leave behind. It can remain part of their world through several juvenile years before the broader seasonal movements of adulthood become established. Exactly how strongly young sharks remain connected to individual nursery areas is still being studied, but nursery habitat can shape where they spend some of the most vulnerable years of their lives (Heupel et al., 2007; NOAA Fisheries, 2017, 2024).
Around New River Inlet and the beaches of Topsail, those later seasonal movements begin intersecting with the migrations already underway. Schools of mullet, Spanish mackerel, and other coastal fishes can create concentrated feeding opportunities along the same corridor, and both blacktips and spinner sharks may breach during fast pursuits, with spinner sharks sometimes twisting through the air in the leaps that gave the species its name (Bangley, 2014).
A beachgoer watching a fall bait ball may therefore be seeing several stages of the coastal food web converge in the same narrow stretch of water.
Atlantic sharpnose sharks (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae) use shallow coastal waters, sounds, bays, and estuaries throughout the warmer months. Adults are generally only a few feet long and feed on small fishes, shrimp, crabs, squid, and other coastal prey (Bethea et al., 2006; Roskar et al., 2024).
Their fall movement is much smaller in scale than the southward migration of blacktips. During summer, Atlantic sharpnose are abundant in the shallow nearshore waters of Onslow Bay, where both immature and mature sharks occur and pups are likely born. As autumn progresses, they become less common in those shallow areas and shift toward deeper coastal habitat. Adults have even been found using offshore wrecks in North Carolina during winter before returning toward shallower water in spring (Roskar et al., 2024).
So for Atlantic sharpnose, fall may mean moving offshore without leaving the region entirely. Predation does not disappear from the coastal food web; it simply shifts into a different part of it.
Atlantic sharpnose shark (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae), a small coastal shark common in North Carolina’s warmer months. | Image credit: Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus) show how different that scale can become. Young sandbars spend the warmer months in shallow nursery habitat farther north along the Mid-Atlantic, then move offshore and south during late September and October. Many repeat that seasonal route for several years as juveniles, wintering from North Carolina toward Florida before returning north in spring. As they grow, the journey expands, with older sandbars ranging from southern New England to Florida and Cuba (Merson & Pratt, 2001; McCandless et al., 2007; Kohler et al., 1998).
Their autumn departure is tied closely to cooling water and shortening day length, while prey encountered along the route determines where they may stop and feed (Manz et al., 2025).
Sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus), a large coastal species that shifts south and offshore as fall progresses. | Image credit: Simon Peggs, iNaturalist
Off Onslow County, artificial reefs and natural hard-bottom habitats add patches of structure to that broader migration corridor. AR-342, the Onslow Bay Saltwater Fishing Club Reef, lies in about 49 feet of water and is one such patch where fishes and other prey can concentrate along the shelf (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2017).
A reef does not have to be an animal’s destination to matter. Sometimes it is simply a place to feed before the migration continues.
AR-342, the Onslow Bay Saltwater Fishing Club Reef, shown within the nearshore reef network off Onslow County. | Image credit: NC Division of Marine Fisheries
Cobia and the Last Warm-Water Feeding
Cobia (Rachycentron canadum) are another warm-season visitor beginning to run out of time. During spring and summer they move north along the Atlantic coast, using coastal and offshore waters from the Carolinas into Chesapeake Bay and farther north. They favor warm water, generally around 68–86°F, and as autumn temperatures begin slipping toward the lower end of that range, they start shifting offshore and south toward warmer winter habitat (Jensen & Graves, 2020).
Cobia (Rachycentron canadum), a warm-water coastal fish that begins shifting offshore and south as autumn temperatures cool. | Image credit: georgeh04, iNaturalist
That places coastal North Carolina somewhere in the middle of the journey. The cobia moving through our waters are not necessarily arriving for winter or leaving from a summer home here.
For many, this stretch of coast is part of the route between the two.
Along the way, structure matters. Buoys, wrecks, reefs, and artificial reefs can gather baitfish and other prey into small pockets of activity in otherwise open water, giving a traveling cobia a place to feed before continuing south (Jensen & Graves, 2020). A reef that holds feeding cobia may also be busy with reef fishes, passing mackerel, schools of bait, and other predators using the same patch of water for their own reasons.
By fall, the coast begins to feel less like a collection of separate habitats and more like a series of connected stopping places along the migration route.
Flounder Leave Through the Bottom
Not every migration announces itself at the surface. Some of the most important fall movement in Onslow County happens quietly along the bottom.
Southern (left) and summer flounder (right) both spend much of their early lives over shallow estuarine and coastal bottoms before mature fish move offshore to spawn. | Image credits: J. Weferling, iNaturalist (left); harrier, iNaturalist (right)
Southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma) spend the first years of their lives inside estuaries, lying over mud, sand, oyster habitat, creek bottoms, and other shallow nursery and feeding areas where they prey on fish and crustaceans. In North Carolina, many females begin reaching reproductive maturity around ages one to two and roughly 16 inches in length, although growth and maturity vary considerably among individual fish (Midway & Scharf, 2012). That means a southern flounder can spend years growing within the estuary before ever contributing to the offshore spawning population. Immature fish may remain within estuarine waters through winter, while mature fish begin leaving in fall for offshore spawning habitat. Fish encountered farther offshore tend to be larger and older, while younger fish remain more closely associated with the sounds, rivers, and creeks where they grew (Craig et al., 2015). A fish that spent its first years nearly invisible beneath New River mud can suddenly become part of an offshore migration.
Summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) make a similar outward journey, although their early life follows a slightly different timetable. Larvae and juveniles use coastal bays, sounds, and estuaries as nursery habitat for roughly their first 18 to 20 months, and most reach reproductive maturity around age two to three. In the South Atlantic Bight, about half are mature by roughly 11 to 12 inches total length, although females generally mature at a somewhat larger size than males (Packer, 1999).
Like southern flounder, they spend their younger years feeding and growing in protected coastal habitat before mature fish begin moving offshore in fall toward continental-shelf spawning grounds. By then, the fish leaving the estuary are not simply larger versions of the juveniles that remain behind; they are the part of the population capable of producing the next generation. So the two flatfish a beachgoer might easily confuse are doing something remarkably similar at this time of year. Both spend their younger years in shallow coastal and estuarine nursery habitat, and both eventually move offshore to spawn. What differs is the timing—how quickly they mature, how long they remain closely tied to those nursery grounds, and where along the coast each species is most concentrated.
The Fall Runs Gather Nearshore
The familiar fishes around piers change with fall too.
Spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) and Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) spend important parts of their early lives inside estuaries, feeding over sandy and muddy bottoms on worms, small crustaceans, organic material, and other small prey (Warlen & Burke, 1990; Ross, 1988)
Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) and spot (Leiostomus xanthurus), two familiar estuarine fishes that move toward coastal spawning waters in fall. | Image credit: C. Dzbanski
Spot remain closely tied to estuarine nursery habitat through their first year, gradually moving into deeper and saltier parts of the system as they grow. By fall, the larger fish begin gathering closer to channels, inlets, and the ocean before continuing toward offshore spawning grounds south of Cape Hatteras. There, spawning continues through fall and winter in substantially warmer shelf water, roughly 63–77°F, with the strongest activity around 68°F (Warlen & Chester, 1985; Allen et al., 2024).
Atlantic croaker follow a similar route on a slightly different schedule. Young croaker enter low-salinity estuarine nursery areas after being spawned offshore, then grow rapidly through their first year. As fall develops, many begin moving back toward open coastal water, with the spawning migration beginning as early as September and continuing into winter (White & Chittenden, 1977; Norcross & Austin, 1988).
Weakfish (Cynoscion regalis) join that same seasonal pull toward the coast. Through spring and summer they use sounds, estuaries, and nearshore habitat, feeding heavily on shrimp, crustaceans, and smaller fishes. As autumn water cools toward about 75°F, they begin gathering and shifting offshore and south; during warmer years, some linger longer before making that move (Krause et al., 2020).
Weakfish (Cynoscion regalis), a fall migrant along the Atlantic coast and currently listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. | Image credit: aiden007, iNaturalist
By this point in fall, fishes that spent summer scattered through different parts of the estuary are beginning to converge along the same channels, inlets, and nearshore corridor. The movement is outward, but not entirely.
While larger spot and croaker are leaving for offshore spawning grounds, their next generation is already beginning the opposite journey. Larvae produced offshore in fall and winter can begin entering North Carolina estuaries by late fall and early winter, with that inward movement continuing through spring (Warlen & Burke, 1990; Allen et al., 2024).
So even as one generation moves out through the inlet, another is beginning to come back in.
The Fish That Stay—but Change Address
Migration does not always mean leaving Onslow County. For some fishes, fall means finding a different part of the same estuary.
Spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus), or speckled trout, remain in coastal North Carolina through winter, but they do not necessarily stay where they spent August. As the shallow sounds and creek edges cool, trout begin gathering around channels, deeper holes, creek mouths, and other places where a few extra feet of water can provide more stable temperatures.
Spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) moving through shallow coastal water before shifting toward deeper winter habitat as temperatures fall. | Image credit: charliew82, iNaturalist
That difference becomes increasingly important as winter approaches. Spotted seatrout begin showing cold stress when water falls below about 45°F, and prolonged periods below roughly 44.6°F can produce substantial winter mortality in North Carolina. Deeper sections of an estuary can remain slightly warmer during a severe cold event, giving fish somewhere to retreat when the shallows become too cold (Ellis, Buckel, & Hightower, 2017; Ellis, Buckel, Hightower, & Poland, 2017).
So the autumn congregation of trout around creek mouths, bridge structure, channels, and deep holes is more than a change in where they happen to be feeding. By fall, they are beginning to settle into the parts of the estuary that may carry them through winter.
Black drum (Pogonias cromis) reorganize themselves through fall as well, although their movement depends partly on age. Young black drum spend their first year within estuaries, feeding over mud, sand, oyster habitat, and other bottoms rich in worms, small crustaceans, and mollusks. As they grow, they begin using saltier water and deeper coastal habitat, while larger fish are often associated with oyster bars, bridge and dock pilings, channels, and other structure where clams, oysters, crabs, and other bottom prey collect (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2026).
Black drum (Pogonias cromis) use estuaries when young, then shift toward deeper, saltier water as they grow and fall progresses. | Image credit: zachs, iNaturalist
By late fall, black drum generally shift away from the shallowest summer habitat toward deeper bays, sounds, channels, and offshore water. Unlike spotted seatrout, there is not one well-defined temperature at which that movement begins. Instead, cooling water gradually changes where suitable feeding and winter habitat remain available, with older fish tending to range farther toward high-salinity and offshore waters (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2026).
A piling or oyster bar that held one mix of fishes through summer may still be occupied in November, but by a different combination of animals using the same structure for colder-water feeding and refuge.
The habitat has not disappeared. Its seasonal community has changed.
Shrimp Begin Pouring Out of the Creeks
Some of the most important migrants along the Onslow County coast are only a few inches long.
White shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus), locally called greentails, spend much of their early lives inside estuarine nursery habitat. They grow rapidly in warm water, and once they reach only about 0.8 to 1.2 inches long, they begin leaving the shallowest marsh habitat for deeper creeks, rivers, bays, and sounds. By late summer and fall, larger young shrimp—often around 4.7 inches or more—are moving farther downstream toward channels, inlets, and ultimately the ocean (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2023).
White shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus) grow quickly in estuarine nurseries before moving downstream toward sounds, inlets, and coastal water in late summer and fall. | Image credit: portulaca, iNaturalist
Cooling water helps drive that progression, but rainfall can accelerate it. Heavy freshwater input lowers estuarine salinity and can push shrimp downstream and toward the ocean before they otherwise would have left. That means a wet fall and a dry fall do not necessarily produce the same migration (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2023).
The shrimp are responding to an estuary that is changing around them, and almost everything seems interested in eating them. Flounder, speckled trout, red drum, weakfish, sharks, wading birds, and humans all take advantage of shrimp as they move through the coastal food web (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2023).
A strong outward movement of white shrimp is therefore not merely a shrimp migration. It is a moving food resource.
When those shrimp leave marsh creeks and spread toward the sound and inlet, predators that were previously separated begin encountering the same pulse of prey in increasingly narrow parts of the estuary.
The estuary briefly becomes a funnel.
The Blue Crabs Take Different Roads
Blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) complicate the idea of a single fall migration even further because males and females do not necessarily go the same direction.
Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) in shallow estuarine habitat; mature females eventually move toward saltier water and coastal spawning areas. | Image credit: lenora_irene, iNaturalist
Adult males generally remain farther upriver in lower-salinity water, while mature females move toward saltier portions of the estuary and eventually toward inlet and coastal spawning habitat. Females can travel considerable distances during this migration, using salinity gradients, tides, and currents to move toward the high-salinity water needed for spawning (Bell & Eggleston, 2023; Forward et al., 2003).
That split makes sense once their life cycle is considered. Females typically mate in brackish estuarine water, then store sperm until they are ready to produce an egg mass. As spawning approaches, they move toward the lower estuary and inlet, where much saltier water provides the conditions their developing larvae need. Eggs hatch near the mouth of the estuary or just beyond it, and the larvae are carried offshore before later returning toward the coast as postlarvae (Forward et al., 2003; Epifanio, 2019).
The same inlet therefore serves two directions of the blue crab life cycle: mature females move outward toward spawning water, while a later generation is carried back toward estuarine nursery habitat.
For a blue crab, the difference between a brackish river and a salty inlet is not simply scenery. One supports mating and much of adult life, while the other provides the salinity needed to begin the next generation.
A single life cycle requires both.
Rays Begin Leaving the Shallows
Large dark wings moving beneath clear water are among the more obvious signs that rays are using shallow coastal habitat during summer. By fall, where those rays appear—and how they move through the coast—begins to change.
Cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) are highly mobile schooling rays that use North Carolina sounds, estuaries, and nearshore waters during the warmer months. Through summer they may be scattered across that habitat, sometimes appearing alone or in small groups over shallow flats and sounds. As fall develops, rays that have been using North Carolina estuaries begin moving toward the ocean side, while migrants arriving from farther north join the same southbound corridor along the Carolina coast.
That is when larger schools can become more noticeable along the beaches and nearshore waters. Their movement continues south toward winter habitat off Florida, with cooling water helping shape when they leave northern and estuarine habitats (Goodman et al., 2010; Omori & Fisher, 2017; Bangley et al., 2021).
Cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) traveling in a school, a familiar sight as they gather and move along the coast in fall. | Image credit: Chesapeake Bay Program
For someone watching from Topsail, the rays seen scattered through the sound during summer can become part of something much larger by fall. A few dark wings moving over an estuarine flat may give way to schools traveling along the ocean side as North Carolina becomes part of the passage between northern summer waters and winter habitat farther south.
Southern stingrays (Hypanus americanus) make a quieter seasonal shift. Their summer presence along North Carolina is part of a much older warm-season pattern, with southern stingrays historically documented moving north along the Carolina coast as warmer water expands their usable habitat (Coles, 1913).
Unlike cownose rays traveling in schools higher in the water column, southern stingrays remain closely tied to the bottom. Through summer, they can be a familiar sight moving over warm sand and mud flats, along creek mouths, and through shallow estuarine water as they search the bottom for worms, bivalves, shrimp, crabs, and small fishes. Even when they move between habitats, much of that movement remains along or just above the benthic surface rather than through open water (Gilliam & Sullivan, 1993; Tilley et al., 2013).
As the shallow flats cool through fall, they become less common in the places where beachgoers may have seen them repeatedly through July and August. Their seasonal movement is not mapped nearly as clearly in North Carolina as that of cownose rays, so we cannot point to one temperature or one offshore route. What we can say is that southern stingrays are capable of moving between shallow flats and considerably deeper bottom habitat while remaining closely associated with the seafloor (Coles, 1913; Corcoran et al., 2013).
For someone watching the shallows, that change may simply look like absence. The stingray that repeatedly crossed the same warm flat all summer is suddenly harder to find—not because it has joined a large southbound school above the bottom, but because its usable benthic habitat has shifted beyond the shallows where it was easiest to see.
Red Drum Gather at the Edges
Red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), and our state fish, add another layer to the fall movement. Young fish spend their first years closely tied to estuaries, growing quickly from roughly 12 to 14 inches by their first birthday to more than 27 inches during their second full year. They do not reach reproductive maturity quite as quickly, however. In North Carolina, most become mature around ages three to four, when they are roughly 30 to 36 inches long (Ross et al., 1995).
Red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) grow in estuaries when young, while larger adults gather around inlets and nearshore waters during late-summer and fall spawning. | Image credit: colesutton, iNaturalist
That difference is something a beachgoer or angler can actually see. The smaller “puppy drum” encountered along marsh edges, creeks, and sounds are still growing within the estuarine part of their life cycle, while the much larger fish appearing around beaches and inlets are increasingly part of the adult population that spends more time in coastal and ocean waters. By late summer and early fall, mature red drum gather around inlets, beaches, and nearshore waters, where spawning and feeding can overlap. In North Carolina, spawning occurs from August into early October near barrier-island inlets and adjacent coastal waters. During that same period, adults move more actively between estuarine and ocean habitats (Ross et al., 1995; Bacheler et al., 2009).
That puts a large red drum outside New River Inlet directly into the same corridor carrying mullet, menhaden, shrimp, spot, croaker, and other prey toward the ocean. It may be there to spawn, to feed, or simply because its own seasonal movement has brought it into the same narrow stretch of coast.
As fall gives way to winter, mature adults increasingly move into ocean waters where temperatures remain more moderate, while younger red drum are much more likely to remain behind in the estuary (Stewart & Scharf, 2008).
The Offshore Visitors Come Close
Fall also brings some animals toward the coast before eventually carrying them away.
King mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) are warm-water fish that seldom move into water much below about 68°F. Through summer and the warmer part of fall, they can move surprisingly close to the beaches, inlet mouths, and nearshore reefs of North Carolina, following schools of menhaden, mullet, sardines, and other prey into places where a beachgoer or pier angler may suddenly encounter a fish that spends much of its time farther offshore (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2022).
That window does not last. As coastal water continues cooling toward the lower edge of their preferred range, king mackerel begin shifting south and farther toward the warmer waters of the continental shelf. By winter, much of the Atlantic population has moved toward southern Florida, while some fish remain in deeper North Carolina waters near the Gulf Stream (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2022).
For a few weeks, that creates an unusual overlap along the Onslow coast. Animals moving out of the estuary meet predators moving closer to shore to feed, while other migrants are already passing south or beginning their move offshore. An inlet or artificial reef that seemed relatively quiet several weeks earlier can suddenly sit at the crossing point of several different seasonal routes.
For a short time, it becomes an intersection.
Then the Menhaden Arrive
By October and November, another migration becomes increasingly visible.
Atlantic menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) move south along the Atlantic coast as fall deepens, with older and larger fish returning from summer waters farther north. Spawning can occur along the migration route from late fall into early spring, but one of the major winter gathering areas lies off North Carolina near Cape Hatteras (Lewis et al., 1987; Nicholson, 1978).
For Onslow County, that means some of the dark schools appearing beyond the breakers are part of a much larger coastwide movement passing our beaches on the way toward winter spawning waters.
Menhaden occupy an unusual place in the coastal food web. They filter tiny phytoplankton and zooplankton from the water, then gather that scattered production into dense schools of oily fish large enough for predators to chase (Lewis & Peters, 1994). Bluefish, striped bass, sharks, tunas, dolphins, and seabirds all take advantage of them, making menhaden one of the connections between plankton near the bottom of the food web and some of the largest predators along the coast (Chagaris et al., 2020; Lewis & Peters, 1994).
For a beachgoer, the first sign may simply be a dark patch offshore that does not move like a shadow. Then birds begin gathering above it. The surface breaks as predators push into the school from below, and what looked like an indistinct patch of water suddenly becomes one of the busiest places along the beach.
That is when looking up becomes as important as looking into the water.
Because another migration has arrived.
The Atlantic Flyway Meets the Fall Fish Run
The Atlantic Flyway follows the eastern edge of North America, placing the North Carolina coast directly beneath one of the continent’s major migration routes. For birds traveling hundreds or thousands of miles between breeding and wintering grounds, Onslow County is not simply coastline passing beneath their wings. Its beaches, marshes, tidal flats, sounds, and inlets can provide places to rest and replenish the energy needed for the next part of the journey (Smith et al., 2022).
The Atlantic Flyway follows the eastern edge of North America, carrying migrating birds directly along the North Carolina coast. | Image credit: Audubon
Fall makes that stop especially busy because the migration overhead is unfolding at the same time the water below is changing. Shrimp are moving out of creeks. Mullet and other fishes are funneling toward the inlets. Schools of bait gather along the beaches, and menhaden begin moving down the coast. For birds that feed on fishes and coastal invertebrates, those movements can turn the Onslow shoreline into a series of feeding opportunities along the Atlantic Flyway.
But the transition is not a clean exchange in which the summer birds simply leave and winter birds immediately take their places. It happens gradually, with departures, arrivals, and birds merely passing through overlapping for weeks.
The Birds Moving Through or South
Some of the first changes are easiest to notice in the marsh. Green herons (Butorides virescens) begin moving south from late August through October, while least bitterns (Ixobrychus exilis) also leave much of their northern breeding range for warmer winter habitat. A bird that spent summer hunting from the edge of a tidal creek may simply become harder to find as September advances (Smith et al., 2022).
Along the beaches and nesting islands, the summer community begins loosening in several directions at once. Wilson’s plovers (Anarhynchus wilsonia), least terns (Sternula antillarum), gull-billed terns (Gelochelidon nilotica), black skimmers (Rynchops niger), and sandwich terns (Thalasseus sandvicensis) begin leaving breeding areas or redistributing south along the coast. Royal terns (Thalasseus maximus) may linger longer, while ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) begin following waterways and coastlines toward wintering grounds farther south (North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 2025; Smith et al., 2022).
The shorebirds make the transition even less tidy.
The eastern Willet (Tringa semipalmata semipalmata) breeds in Atlantic salt marshes, including those along the North Carolina coast, before leaving for wintering grounds that can lie as far away as northern South America. But the Willet standing on a Topsail flat in fall is not automatically one of the birds that nested here. Western Willets (Tringa semipalmata inornata), which breed in the interior of western North America, can also occur along the Atlantic coast outside the breeding season. For a few weeks, birds from very different summer landscapes may use the same Carolina shoreline (Oswald et al., 2016; Huysman et al., 2022).
Lesser yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes) and greater yellowlegs (Tringa melanoleuca) add another layer of passing traffic. They arrive from breeding grounds much farther north, with adults beginning their southward movements as early as July and younger birds following later. Along coastal North Carolina, exposed flats, shallow marsh edges, and pools of tidal water become temporary feeding grounds along that journey (Smith et al., 2022).
That makes the falling tide part of the migration too. A mudflat that looked empty beneath the previous high tide can suddenly hold Willets, yellowlegs, plovers, and other shorebirds probing exposed sediment for worms, small crustaceans, mollusks, and other prey. North Carolina barrier-island studies have found fall shorebirds shifting among the swash zone, wet sand, spits, and tidal habitat as water levels change, using different pieces of the shoreline for feeding and resting through the tidal cycle (Tarr, 2008).
For some of those birds, the stop may last days. For others, only hours. The tide falls, a feeding ground appears, and birds moving along the Atlantic coast briefly settle into it before the water—or the migration—carries them onward.
The Winter Coast Begins Arriving
The winter coast does not arrive all at once. Its first birds begin appearing in September, more follow through October, and by November the sounds, marshes, and beaches of Onslow County can hold a noticeably different community than they did at the end of summer.
On the sounds and protected water behind the barrier islands, buffleheads (Bucephala albeola) begin settling into sheltered coves, bays, and estuaries, repeatedly disappearing beneath the surface in search of small crustaceans, mollusks, and other aquatic prey. Red-breasted mergansers (Mergus serrator) arrive as well, often working shallow coastal water and estuaries in small groups as they dive after fish (Gauthier, 1993; Titman, 1999; Smith et al., 2022).
The marsh begins changing at the same time. American black ducks (Anas rubripes) appear more regularly in salt marshes, tidal creeks, ponds, and estuaries, while Green-winged teal (Anas crecca) increase in shallow protected water. Both spent the breeding season much farther north, but by fall the sounds and marshes of the Atlantic coast have become part of their winter landscape (Robinson et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2022).
Along the ocean side, the change is visible at the water’s edge. Dunlin (Calidris alpina), sanderlings (Calidris alba), red knots (Calidris canutus), and black-bellied plovers (Pluvialis squatarola) begin working beaches, shoals, exposed flats, and inlet margins. Some will remain along the southeastern coast through winter, while others are pausing only long enough to feed before continuing south. As the tide falls they spread across wet sand and exposed flats; when the water returns, they are gradually pushed toward higher beaches and roosting areas (Burger et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2022; Tarr, 2008).
Red knots make the scale of that movement especially clear. A bird standing quietly near the wrack line may have arrived from Arctic breeding grounds and may still be headed toward winter habitat in the southeastern United States, the Caribbean, or northern South America. Individual birds do not all travel the same route or distance, but for some, the Carolina coast is only one stop in a journey spanning thousands of miles (Burger et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2022).
That changes what a quiet fall beach can mean. The wet sand, tidal flats, wrack, marshes, and sheltered water are not empty spaces between destinations. For birds arriving from the north, they are places to replace the energy already spent before the next part of the migration begins.
When the Food Web Takes to the Air
Fall adds another layer of hunters above the shoreline.
Peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) move south along the Atlantic coast during migration, often following the same barrier islands, mudflats, and shorelines being used by migrating shorebirds. They are not interested in the mullet, shrimp, or menhaden moving below the surface. They are interested in the birds feeding around them. Shorebirds, ducks, gulls, and other coastal birds become prey themselves, adding another level to the food web moving through the coast (Smith et al., 2022).
Farther offshore, the change becomes visible in a different way. Double-crested cormorants (Nannopterum auritum) arrive along the Carolina coast in large numbers and spend much of their time diving after fish. Menhaden are among the schooling fishes they readily take, tying these winter visitors directly into the same fall movement already passing through the inlets and along the beaches (Watts et al., 2023).
Red-throated loons (Gavia stellata) and common loons (Gavia immer) begin appearing along the ocean side as well. Both spend the warmer months much farther north, but by late fall they are back in shallow marine waters, sounds, bays, and estuaries where fish are abundant. A bird that spent summer on a northern lake or tundra pond may now be diving just beyond the breakers along Topsail (Stenhouse et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2022).
Then come the northern gannets (Morus bassanus).
By late fall, they become one of the most spectacular signs that the seasonal food web has shifted. Northern gannets spend much of the nonbreeding season between New York and North Carolina, feeding almost entirely on schooling fishes such as herring, mackerel, and menhaden over the continental shelf (Mowbray, 2020; Smith et al., 2022).
From shore, a feeding aggregation can seem to appear from nowhere. Large white birds circle above a patch of ocean, fold their wings, and plunge headfirst into the water. One follows another until dozens may be dropping into the same moving patch of sea.
The important thing may not be the gannets themselves, but what they are pointing toward. Beneath them is a school of fish. Around that school may be bluefish, sharks, dolphins, or other large predators pushing the same prey toward the surface. The birds above and the predators below are using the same concentration of food from opposite directions.
What began months earlier as plankton, marsh production, and small animals feeding inside estuaries has now moved far enough through the food web to become visible from the beach as birds falling out of the sky.
What Happens if One Migration Does Not Arrive?
It is easy to think about migration as something belonging to individual species—the mullet run, the shrimp migration, the shark migration, the Atlantic Flyway. But the coast does not experience those movements separately. Predators are responding to prey, young fishes are entering estuaries when nursery habitat and food are available, adults are leaving when spawning habitat lies offshore, and blue crabs are moving between different salinity zones because different stages of their lives depend on different parts of the estuary (Warlen & Burke, 1990; Forward et al., 2003).
That means a change in one migration does not necessarily stop with the animal making it.
If fewer mullet leave an estuary, there may be less concentrated prey moving along the beach for bluefish, sharks, pelicans, and terns. The difference is not simply fewer mullet in one place. Some of the energy that spent summer accumulating inside the estuary now reaches the nearshore food web in a different amount, at a different time, or along a different route (Bacheler et al., 2005).
White shrimp show how quickly those relationships can shift. Heavy rainfall lowers estuarine salinity and can push shrimp toward the inlet earlier than they might have moved during a drier fall. Predators farther inside the estuary may encounter fewer shrimp, while those gathered nearer the inlet may suddenly encounter more. The migration still happens, but its timing changes where that pulse of food becomes available (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, 2023).
Temperature can alter the overlap in another way. A coastal shark that remains farther north later into a warm fall may not encounter its prey in quite the same places or at quite the same time if those prey are responding to a different set of seasonal cues. Warmer ocean conditions are already capable of delaying southward shark migrations and extending how long some species remain in northern seasonal habitat (Manz et al., 2025).
None of this means every migration must occur on the same date each year. Coastal systems have always varied with storms, rainfall, temperature, currents, and food availability. What matters is that the movements continue to cross one another often enough for the relationships among them to persist.
A predator still has to encounter its prey. A larva still has to reach suitable nursery habitat, and a migrating bird still has to find enough food to continue south.
The timing does not have to be exact, but the meeting still has to happen.
Watching the Coast Change
By September, the first changes are already beginning. Mullet gather near the inlets, shrimp move out of tidal creeks, rays become less common over shallow flats, and feeding birds begin revealing where bait has collected near the surface.
By October and November, the same places can hold a very different community. Some animals have moved only a few miles into deeper water, while others are passing Onslow County on journeys that continue far beyond the Carolina coast.
The landscape itself looks much the same. New River Inlet still cuts through the barrier island. The marsh grass still bends with the wind. The same beach stretches north and south. What changes is who is moving through it.
For a few months each fall, Onslow County becomes a meeting place between departures, arrivals, and animals simply shifting into the next piece of habitat they need.
The landscape stays where it is. The food web moves through it.
Wilson Bay along the New River in Jacksonville, North Carolina. The landscape stays where it is, even as the food web moves through it. | Image credit: A. Mitchell
References
Allen, D. M., Govoni, J. J., Able, K. W., Buckel, J. A., Hale, E. A., Hilton, E. J., Kellison, G. T., Targett, T. E., Taylor, J. C., & Walsh, H. J. (2024). Long-term dynamics of larval and early juvenile spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) off the U.S. East Coast: Relating ocean origins, estuarine Ingress, and changing environmental conditions. Fishery Bulletin, 122(4), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.7755/fb.122.4.3
Bacheler, N. M., Paramore, L. M., Burdick, S. M., Buckel, J. A., & Hightower, J. E. (2009). Variation in movement patterns of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) inferred from conventional tagging and ultrasonic telemetry. Fishery Bulletin, 107(4), 405-419. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/2009/1074/bacheler.pdf
Bacheler, N. M., Wong, R. A., & Buckel, J. A. (2005). Movements and mortality rates of striped mullet in North Carolina. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 25(1), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.1577/m04-033.1
Bangley, C. W., Edwards, M. L., Mueller, C., Fisher, R. A., Aguilar, R., Heggie, K., Richie, K., Ahr, B. J., & Ogburn, M. B. (2021). Environmental associations of cownose ray (Rhinoptera bonasus) seasonal presence along the U.S. Atlantic coast. Ecosphere, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3743
Bell, G. W., & Eggleston, D. B. (2023). Timing and route of migration of mature female blue crabs in a large, wind-driven Estuary. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 152(2), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10391
Bichy, J. B. (2004). A life history assessment on the reproduction and growth of striped mullet, Mugil cephalus, in North Carolina [Unpublished master’s thesis]. North Carolina State University.
Burger, J., Niles, L. J., Porter, R. R., Dey, A. D., Koch, S., & Gordon, C. (2012). Using a shore bird (red knot) fitted with geolocators to evaluate a conceptual risk model focusing on offshore wind. Renewable Energy, 43, 370-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.11.006
Carlson, J. K., Sulikowski, J. R., & Baremore, I. E. (2006). Do differences in life history exist for blacktip sharks, Carcharhinus limbatus, from the United States south Atlantic bight and eastern Gulf of Mexico? Environmental Biology of Fishes, 77(3-4), 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9129-x
Chagaris, D., Drew, K., Schueller, A., Cieri, M., Brito, J., & Buchheister, A. (2020). Ecological reference points for Atlantic menhaden established using an ecosystem model of intermediate complexity. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.606417
Coles, R. J. (1913). Notes on the embryos of several species of rays, with remarks on the northward summer migration of certain tropical forms observed on the coast of North Carolina. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 32, 29-35. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/26891225#page/491/mode/1up
Corcoran, M. J., Wetherbee, B. M., Shivji, M. S., Potenski, M. D., Chapman, D. D., & Harvey, G. M. (2013). Supplemental feeding for ecotourism reverses Diel activity and alters movement patterns and spatial distribution of the southern Stingray, Dasyatis americana. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059235
Craig, J. K., Smith, W. E., Scharf, F. S., & Monaghan, J. P. (2015). Estuarine residency and migration of southern flounder inferred from conventional tag returns at multiple spatial scales. Marine and Coastal Fisheries, 7(1), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2015.1079578
Ellis, T. A., Buckel, J. A., Hightower, J. E., & Poland, S. J. (2017). Relating cold tolerance to winterkill for spotted seatrout at its northern latitudinal limits. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 490, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2017.01.010
Ellis, T., Buckel, J., & Hightower, J. (2017). Winter severity influences spotted seatrout mortality in a southeast US estuarine system. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 564, 145-161. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11985
Epifanio, C. E. (2019). Early life history of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus: A review. Journal of Shellfish Research, 38(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2983/035.038.0101
Forward, R. B., Tankersley, R. A., & Welch, J. M. (2003). Selective tidal-stream transport of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus: An overview. Bulletin of Marine Science, 72(2), 347-365. https://scholars.duke.edu/publication/771475
Gauthier, G. (1993). Bufflehead (Bucephala albeola). In The Birds of North America (67th ed.). The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia & The American Ornithologists’ Union.
Goodman, M. A., Conn, P. B., & Fitzpatrick, E. (2010). Seasonal occurrence of Cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) in North Carolina’s estuarine and coastal waters. Estuaries and Coasts, 34(3), 640-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-010-9355-5
Heupel, M., Carlson, J., & Simpfendorfer, C. (2007). Shark nursery areas: Concepts, definition, characterization and assumptions. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 337, 287-297. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps337287
Huysman, A. E., Cooper, N. W., Smith, J. A., Haig, S. M., Heath, S. A., Johnson, L., Olson, E., Regan, K., Wilson, J. K., & Marra, P. P. (2022). Strong migratory connectivity indicates Willets need subspecies-specific conservation strategies. Ornithological Applications, 124(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duac015
Jensen, D. R., & Graves, J. E. (2020). Movements, habitat utilization, and post-release survival of cobia (Rachycentron canadum) that summer in Virginia waters assessed using pop-up satellite archival tags. Animal Biotelemetry, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-020-00212-0
Krause, J. R., Hightower, J. E., Buckel, J. A., Turnure, J. T., Grothues, T. M., Manderson, J. P., Rosendale, J. E., & Pessutti, J. P. (2020). Using acoustic telemetry to estimate weakfish survival rates along the U.S. East Coast. Marine and Coastal Fisheries, 12(5), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcf2.10095
Lewis, R. M., Ahrenholz, D. W., & Epperly, S. P. (1987). Fecundity of Atlantic menhaden, Brevoortia tyrannus. Estuaries, 10(4), 347. https://doi.org/10.2307/1351894
Lund, W. A., & Maltezos, G. C. (1970). Movements and migrations of the bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix, tagged in waters of New York and southern New England. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 99(4), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1970)99<719:mamotb>2.0.co;2
Manz, M. H., Shipley, O. N., Cerrato, R. M., Hueter, R. E., Newton, A. L., Tyminski, J. P., Franks, B. R., Curtis, T. H., Fischer, C., Zacharias, J. P., Scott, C., Dunton, K. J., Kneebone, J., Peterson, B. J., Scannell, B. J., Dodd, J. F., & Frisk, M. G. (2025). Predictions of southern migration timing in coastal sharks under future ocean warming. Conservation Biology, 39(6), e70080. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70080
McCandless, C. T., Pratt, Jr., H. L., Kohler, N. E., Merson, R. R., & Recksiek, C. W. (2007). Distribution, localized abundance, movements, and migrations of juvenile sandbar sharks tagged in Delaware Bay. In Shark nursery grounds of the Gulf of Mexico and the east coast waters of the United States (pp. 45-62). American Fisheries Society Symposium. https://doi.org/10.47886/9781888569810.ch4
Merson, R. R., & Pratt, Jr., H. L. (2001). Distribution, Movements and Growth of Young Sandbar Sharks, Carcharhinus Plumbeus, in the Nursery Grounds of Delaware Bay. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 61, 13-24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1011017109776
Midway, S. R., & Scharf, F. S. (2012). Histological analysis reveals larger size at maturity for southern flounder with implications for biological reference points. Marine and Coastal Fisheries, 4(1), 628-638. https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2012.717524
Mowbray, T. B. (2020). Northern Gannet (Morus bassanus). In Birds of the World (1.0th ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.norgan.01
Nicholson, W. R. (1978). Movements and population structure of Atlantic menhaden indicated by tag returns. Estuaries, 1(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.2307/1351455
Norcross, B. L., & Austin, H. M. (1988). Middle Atlantic bight meridional wind component effect on bottom water temperatures and spawning distribution of Atlantic croaker. Continental Shelf Research, 8(1), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(88)90025-8
Omori, K. L., & Fisher, R. A. (2017). Summer and fall movement of cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, along the East Coast of United States observed with pop-up satellite tags. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 100(11), 1435-1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-017-0654-6
Oswald, J. A., Harvey, M. G., Remsen, R. C., Foxworth, D. U., Cardiff, S. W., Dittmann, D. L., Megna, L. C., Carling, M. D., & Brumfield, R. T. (2016). Willet be one species or two? A genomic view of the evolutionary history of Tringa semipalmata. The Auk, 133(4), 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1642/auk-15-232.1
Packer, D. B. (1999). Essential fish habitat source document. Summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus, life history and habitat characteristics (NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-151). National Marine Fisheries Service. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/3149
Robinson, O. J., McGowan, C. P., & Devers, P. K. (2016). Updating movement estimates for American Black ducks (Anas rubripes). PeerJ, 4, e1787. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1787
Roskar, G., Morley, J. W., & Buckel, J. A. (2024). Seasonality and relative abundance within an elasmobranch assemblage near a major biogeographic divide. PLOS ONE, 19(6), e0300697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300697
Ross, J. L., Stevens, T. M., & Vaughan, D. S. (1995). Age, growth, mortality, and reproductive biology of red drums in North Carolina waters. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 124(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1995)124<0037:agmarb>2.3.co;2
Ross, S. W. (1988). Age, growth, and mortality of Atlantic croaker in North Carolina, with comments on population dynamics. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 117(5), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1988)117<0461:agamoa>2.3.co;2
Smith, M. A., Mahoney, J., Knight, E. J., Taylor, L., Seavy, N. E., Bailey, O. H., Carbone, M., DeLuca, W., Gonzalez, N. S., Jimenez, M. F., W. O’Bryan, G. M., Rao, N., Witko, C. J., Wilsey, C., & Deppe, J. L. (2022). Bird Migration Explorer. National Audubon Society. https://explorer.audubon.org/
Stenhouse, I. J., Berlin, A. M., Gilbert, A. T., Goodale, M. W., Gray, C. E., Montevecchi, W. A., Savoy, L., & Spiegel, C. S. (2020). Assessing the exposure of three diving bird species to offshore wind areas on the U.S. Atlantic outer continental shelf using satellite telemetry. Diversity and Distributions, 26(12), 1703-1714. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13168
Stewart, C. B., & Scharf, F. S. (2008). Estuarine recruitment, growth, and first‐year survival of juvenile red drum in North Carolina. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 137(4), 1089-1103. https://doi.org/10.1577/t07-176.1
Sutherland, D. F., & Fable, Jr., W. A. (1980). Results of a king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) and Atlantic Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) migration study, 1975–79 (NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFC-12). National Marine Fisheries Service. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/5385
Tilley, A., López-Angarita, J., & Turner, J. (2013). Effects of scale and habitat distribution on the movement of the southern stingray Dasyatis americana on a Caribbean atoll. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 482, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10285
Titman, R. D. (n.d.). Red-breasted Merganser (Mergus serrator). In The Birds of North America (443rd ed.). A. Poole & F. Gill.
Warlen, S. M., & Burke, J. S. (1990). Immigration of larvae of fall/Winter spawning marine fishes into a North Carolina Estuary. Estuaries, 13(4), 453. https://doi.org/10.2307/1351789
Warlen, S. M., & Chester, A. J. (1985). Warlen, S. M., & Chester, A. J. (1985). Age, growth, and distribution of larval spot, Leiostomus xanthurus, off North Carolina. Fishery Bulletin, 83(4), 587–599. Fishery Bulletin, 83(4), 587-599. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/fish-bull/warlen.pdf
Watts, B. D., Paxton, B. J., Hines, C., & Anderson, S. K. (2023). Estimating potential menhaden consumption by double-crested cormorants along the coast of North Carolina. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 1193429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1193429
White, M. L., & Chittenden, Jr., M. E. (1977). Age determination, reproduction, and population dynamics of the Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus. Fishery Bulletin, 75(1), 109-123.
Along the edge of a North Carolina salt marsh, some of the easiest animals to find are also among the easiest to overlook.
Small spiral shells cling to smooth cordgrass, sometimes only inches above the mud and sometimes surprisingly high along the stems. These are marsh periwinkles, Littoraria irrorata, and where they sit changes as the tide moves beneath them. Nearby, oyster shells collect along creek edges and among the vegetation. Beneath one of them may be an Atlantic mud crab, Panopeus herbstii, tucked into a space barely larger than its body.
Neither seems capable of influencing much beyond the few inches it occupies.
Yet the relationship between these two small animals reaches into the grass around them, the sediment beneath them, and eventually the ability of a salt marsh to maintain itself as water levels change.
Both are also indicator species. Their abundance, where they occur, and how they respond to the conditions around them can offer clues about the health of the marsh they share (Fowler & Kingsley-Smith, 2015; Rietl et al., 2018).
For someone walking a boardwalk, paddling a tidal creek, or looking across the marsh on the way to the beach, that makes them particularly interesting. Much of what keeps a salt marsh functioning happens underground, underwater, or so gradually that we never see it happening.
These two animals give us something we can actually watch.
The Snails on the Grass
The marsh periwinkle spends much of its life following the tide up and down the cordgrass.
Marsh periwinkle, Littoraria irrorata. Small enough to fit in the palm of a hand, this marsh snail spends much of its life moving up and down cordgrass with the tide. | Image credit: A. Mitchell
At lower tides, the snails move down the stems and closer to the marsh surface to feed. When the tide comes back in, fish, crabs, and other aquatic predators come with it. The periwinkles respond by climbing higher on the grass, putting distance between themselves and the hunters now swimming below.
So when you see dozens of little snails perched high on the cordgrass beside a flooded marsh, they did not simply choose a nice place to sit.
They have moved upstairs.
As the tide rises, salt marsh periwinkles climb higher on the cordgrass, staying above the water and farther from predators moving through the flooded marsh. | Image credit: andyjones, iNaturalist
That daily trip between the lower grass and the safety of the upper stems is shaped partly by predators. Where those predators are more common, periwinkles change where they spend their time and may even develop differently under that continued pressure (Rietl et al., 2018).
When the water falls again, the little climbers come back down.
As the tide falls, periwinkles move back down through the cordgrass toward the marsh surface, where much of their feeding takes place. | Image credit: JunoMoon, iNaturalist
And this is where their job in the marsh becomes especially interesting.
Periwinkles graze across the surface of smooth cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora. One easy way to picture them is as tiny lawnmowers moving through the marsh. They do not clip every blade equally, though. They often favor older, yellowing, or dead cordgrass, helping work through plant material that is already on its way out (Klinges et al., 2025).
But their feeding is not as simple as taking a bite from a blade of grass.
Those scrapes leave small wounds on the cordgrass where fungi can grow. The snails later return to those areas and feed again, consuming the fungal growth along with plant material. When snail numbers and grazing become unusually high, those repeated wounds can contribute to heavier fungal growth and increasing damage to the cordgrass (Silliman & Newell, 2003).
Like a lawn, the important part is not whether the grass is ever cut.
It is how much.
Enough grazing is part of a functioning marsh. Periwinkles belong here, and their feeding is one of many interactions helping shape the plant community. But put too many little lawnmowers in the same patch and they can begin cutting faster than the grass can recover. Cordgrass becomes shorter and thinner, more plant tissue is wounded, and eventually patches can begin to disappear.
Studies in southeastern salt marshes have shown just how far that change can go when predators are removed and periwinkles become unusually abundant. Heavy grazing can contribute to substantial losses of Spartina rather than simply keeping its growth in check (Altieri et al., 2012).
Fewer snails are not automatically better, either. Grazers are part of the balance of the marsh, just as predators are. What matters is that no single part of the relationship overwhelms the others.
And one of the animals helping keep these little lawnmowers in check is usually not up on the grass at all.
It is waiting below.
Beneath the Shell
Atlantic mud crabs, Panopeus herbstii, are much easier to miss.
Atlantic mud crab, Panopeus herbstii. Small, heavily clawed, and easy to miss among shell and mud, this lower-marsh predator helps keep periwinkle grazers in check. | Image credit: nickifal, iNaturalist
If you have ever looked among oyster shells at the lower edge of a marsh creek, you have looked directly into the kind of neighborhood they prefer. Mud crabs tuck beneath shell and stones, move over muddy bottoms, and use shallow burrows along marsh edges. They live in estuaries where the water is never quite the same from one day to the next—saltier during some periods, fresher after heavy rain, warmer through summer and cooler through winter. Atlantic mud crabs are remarkably good at living within those changing conditions (Fowler & Kingsley-Smith, 2015).
Before any of that, however, a mud crab begins life somewhere very different.
A newly hatched crab does not look like the crab hiding beneath an oyster shell. It begins as a tiny larva drifting in the water, carried through the estuary while it develops. Eventually it must leave that drifting life behind and settle somewhere suitable.
Atlantic mud crab larva, Panopeus herbstii. At this stage, the future bottom-dwelling crab is tiny, transparent, and drifting through the estuary before settling into marsh and oyster-shell habitat. | Image credit: True et al., 2020
Finding that place is not entirely luck.
Young mud crabs can respond to signals in the environment that tell them they have reached the kind of habitat where adult crabs live. Oyster shell, rocks, other organisms, and even the thin films of microorganisms coating submerged surfaces can provide chemical and physical clues that encourage the larva to settle and begin the next stage of life (Andrews et al., 2001; Rodriguez & Epifanio, 2000).
Think about what that means for something small enough to drift with the current.
It does not have a map of the marsh.
Instead, the place itself begins to smell and feel right.
Once settled, the crab eventually becomes one of the predators moving through that habitat. Atlantic mud crabs eat oysters, clams, worms, small crustaceans, snails, and whatever other suitable prey they can capture.
And beneath those oyster shells, researchers have found evidence of one meal again and again.
Periwinkles.
In North Carolina salt marshes, researchers found about 80 percent of the Atlantic mud crab lairs they examined beneath live oyster shells. When they looked at prey remains associated with those lairs, marsh periwinkle shells were among the most common finds (Silliman et al., 2004).
Above the shell, the snail moves along the cordgrass.
Below it, the crab waits.
When Predator Meets Grazer
This is where two small animals begin influencing something much larger.
Periwinkles spend part of each tidal cycle higher on the cordgrass, away from aquatic predators. When the water drops and they move lower to feed, they become more accessible to the mud crabs below.
The crabs do not need to climb the grass and chase them.
They simply need to be there when the snails come back down.
Research has shown that Atlantic mud crabs can keep periwinkle numbers lower, and that mud crab predation increases when more periwinkles are available (Silliman et al., 2004). In practical terms, the predator helps keep all of those little lawnmowers from becoming too numerous.
That matters because the crab is indirectly influencing grass it never eats.
More mud-crab predation can mean fewer periwinkles grazing on the cordgrass. Fewer grazers can mean less pressure on the grass. When predators disappear and periwinkles become too abundant, the opposite can happen.
That chain reaction has a scientific name: a trophic cascade.
A change involving a predator works its way through the animals it eats and eventually affects something farther down the food web. In this case, the path is easy to follow:
mud crab → periwinkle → cordgrass.
Studies elsewhere in southeastern salt marshes have shown how dramatic that cascade can become. Where intensive recreational fishing reduced predator numbers, periwinkles became more abundant, grazing increased, and large areas of marsh vegetation were eventually lost (Altieri et al., 2012).
The Atlantic mud crab never takes a bite from the cordgrass.
Yet by eating an animal that does, it helps influence how much grass remains standing.
And keeping that grass standing turns out to matter far beyond the snail and crab.
An empty periwinkle shell may not stay empty for long. Hermit crabs often move into abandoned shells, turning yesterday’s snail home into today’s shelter. | Image credit: A. Mitchell
What the Grass Holds
A salt marsh has to maintain more than vegetation.
It has to maintain ground.
Smooth cordgrass helps slow the water as each tide moves across the marsh. When the water slows, tiny bits of sand, mud, and other material it was carrying can drop out and settle around the grass. Below the surface, the roots and underground stems help hold that ground together, while old plant material breaks down and becomes part of the marsh soil. Little by little, those layers add up and help the marsh keep its height above the water (Reed, 1995; Elsey-Quirk et al., 2011).
That elevation determines how long and how often the marsh floods.
A difference of only a few inches can change the amount of time vegetation spends underwater, the salinity it experiences, and which plants and animals can occupy a particular part of the marsh.
For a marsh facing rising relative sea level, maintaining elevation becomes increasingly important. If sediment deposition and organic-matter accumulation equal or exceed the rate at which the marsh is becoming submerged, vegetation may persist. If elevation cannot keep pace, flooding increases and vegetation can eventually be lost (Reed, 1995).
A salt marsh has a few ways to keep up as water levels rise. It can build upward as new sediment settles among the grass and as roots and other plant material become part of the soil. It can also slowly shift farther inland onto slightly higher ground—if that ground is still available. How well a marsh can do either depends on the place itself: how much sediment reaches it, how well the vegetation is growing, how strong the tides are, how much erosion is occurring, and how quickly local water levels are rising (Kirwan & Mudd, 2012; Fagherazzi et al., 2020).
The important point is that the biological and physical marsh are not separate systems.
The grass affects sediment.
The sediment affects elevation.
Elevation affects flooding.
Flooding affects the plants and animals.
And among the animals affecting that grass are a snail climbing its stems and a crab waiting below.
When the Water Rises Faster
Sea-level rise can feel abstract when we describe it as a number measured in millimeters or as a line on a map showing where water might be decades from now.
A salt marsh makes it easier to understand.
Marsh plants already live with water coming and going every day. They are built for it. But being covered during part of a normal tide is very different from spending more and more time underwater as the average water level rises.
The marsh has two important ways to respond.
It can build upward as sediment and plant material accumulate. Just up the New River at Camp Lejeune, that struggle to maintain marsh elevation can be seen on the ground.
And, where higher undeveloped ground remains beside it, the marsh can gradually move inland.
That second option matters enormously along a developed coastline.
If rising water makes the lowest edge of a marsh increasingly difficult for cordgrass to occupy, suitable marsh vegetation can begin establishing slightly farther inland. Over time, the position of the marsh shifts.
Unless something is already there.
A road does not move uphill for the marsh.
Neither does a house, parking lot, bulkhead, or other hardened shoreline.
When development occupies the higher ground immediately behind a marsh, rising water can begin pressing from one side while development prevents the marsh from moving on the other. Its room to adjust becomes smaller.
What can eventually disappear is not simply an undeveloped patch of grass that might otherwise have held another building.
NOAA’s Sea Level Rise Viewerlets you watch that landward movement—and where it can become constrained—as water levels change.
The marsh was already working.
Salt marshes provide nursery habitat for fishes and crustaceans, trap sediment, store carbon, help stabilize shorelines, and reduce some of the energy moving through shallow coastal water. Their ability to keep doing those things depends upon the marsh itself remaining high enough, vegetated enough, and connected enough to continue functioning (Fagherazzi et al., 2020).
That is one reason decisions about where and how we build along the coast matter beyond the property line.
A marsh does not have to contain a building to have a purpose.
And Then a Storm Arrives
Sea-level rise changes a marsh gradually.
A storm can rearrange parts of it in a day.
Anyone who lives along the North Carolina coast has seen what heavy rainfall alone can do to local water. Creeks swell. Freshwater pours into sounds and estuaries. Salinity drops. A tropical storm or hurricane can add storm surge, waves, erosion, and enough moving water to carry shell, sediment, wrack, and pieces of the marsh itself from one place to another.
Mud can be stripped away from one creek bank and deposited somewhere else.
Oyster shells that were buried may suddenly be exposed.
Shell that once provided hiding places may be covered.
Cordgrass can be flattened, torn loose, buried beneath wrack, or left standing in a slightly different landscape once the water recedes.
Estuary sediments can preserve that history. In North Carolina’s Albemarle estuarine system, sediments record both the slow changes occurring over decades and the sudden rearrangements associated with storms and other major events (Corbett et al., 2007).
For the Atlantic mud crab and periwinkle, those changes can rearrange the places where their relationship happens.
The periwinkle needs the cordgrass.
The mud crab relies on suitable water conditions, prey, and places such as oyster shell and shallow burrows for cover.
Change the grass, move the shell, freshen the water, or reshape the creek edge and the animals must respond to the new version of the marsh that remains.
That does not mean a healthy marsh should never change.
Quite the opposite.
Tides, storms, erosion, sediment deposition, rainfall, and shifting salinity have always been part of coastal marshes.
What matters is whether enough of the living and physical system remains intact for the marsh to adjust afterward.
Two Species That Tell a Larger Story
This is what makes the Atlantic mud crab and marsh periwinkle especially useful animals to know.
They are not simply inhabitants of the marsh. Both have been used as indicators of conditions within the ecosystems they occupy because their abundance, distribution, and responses are connected to environmental conditions and ecological relationships around them (Fowler & Kingsley-Smith, 2015; Rietl et al., 2018).
The periwinkle gives us one view.
It lives directly on the vegetation, responds to tidal flooding and predation, and can exert increasing pressure on cordgrass when predator–prey relationships change.
The Atlantic mud crab gives us another.
Its abundance is associated with habitat structure, prey availability, Spartina characteristics, oyster habitat, temperature, and salinity, while its predation helps influence the abundance of grazers such as the periwinkle (Silliman et al., 2004; Fowler & Kingsley-Smith, 2015).
Together, they give us something particularly interesting.
They allow us to see part of a trophic relationship that reaches from predator to grazer to plant and, through the plant, into processes affecting the physical marsh.
That does not mean finding ten snails instead of five provides a diagnosis of marsh health, or that turning over one oyster shell and finding no crab means something is wrong. Scientific monitoring requires repeated observations, measurements, and knowledge of local conditions.
But it does mean that these animals are worth noticing.
They can make processes that otherwise seem abstract visible.
Periwinkles scattered through the marsh vegetation offer a visible clue to the living community around them. Their numbers and where they occur can help reveal changes in the balance between grazing, predation, and cordgrass health. | Image credit: BioInteractive
Looking at the Marsh Differently
The next time you are beside the salt marsh along Surf City, look at the grass before you look across it.
Find the little spiral shells.
Notice whether the tide is in or out and where the periwinkles are sitting along the stems. Look lower, toward the mud and oyster shell around the creek edge, at the little spaces where a mud crab might disappear.
Then look at the marsh around them.
Is the cordgrass thick and continuous? Are there areas where the edge is eroding? Has a storm moved wrack or exposed new shell? Where does the water reach at high tide, and where does the ground begin rising toward houses, roads, or other development?
Those observations do not turn a beach walk into a scientific survey.
They do something simpler.
They let us recognize that the marsh is alive with relationships, and that some of the smallest animals in it can help us understand why the larger landscape looks the way it does.
Somewhere in that system, a periwinkle climbs higher as the tide comes in.
Below it, an Atlantic mud crab remains hidden among the shell.
Most people walking toward the beach will pass both without ever knowing they are there.
But once you know what connects them, they become two small signs of something much larger happening beneath your feet.
Across the soundside marshes of Surf City, water, vegetation, wildlife, and the developed shoreline exist side by side—each connected to what happens in the marsh between them. | Image credit: A. Mitchell
References
Altieri, A. H., Bertness, M. D., Coverdale, T. C., Herrmann, N. C., & Angelini, C. (2012). A trophic cascade triggers collapse of a salt-marsh ecosystem with intensive recreational fishing. Ecology, 93(6), 1402–1410.https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1314.1
Andrews, W. R., Targett, N. M., & Epifanio, C. E. (2001). Isolation and characterization of the metamorphic inducer of the common mud crab, Panopeus herbstii. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 261(1), 121–134.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00268-4
Corbett, D. R., Vance, D., Letrick, E., Mallinson, D., & Culver, S. J. (2007). Decadal-scale sediment dynamics and environmental change in the Albemarle estuarine system, North Carolina. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 71(3–4), 717–729.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.09.024
Elsey-Quirk, T., Seliskar, D. M., Sommerfield, C. K., & Gallagher, J. L. (2011). Salt marsh carbon pool distribution in a Mid-Atlantic lagoon, USA: Sea level rise implications. Wetlands, 31(1), 87–99.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-010-0139-2
Fagherazzi, S., Mariotti, G., Leonardi, N., Canestrelli, A., Nardin, W., & Kearney, W. S. (2020). Salt marsh dynamics in a period of accelerated sea level rise. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(8).https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005200
Fowler, A., & Kingsley-Smith, P. (2015). Atlantic mud crab, Panopeus herbstii (H. Milne Edwards 1834). Supplemental Volume: Species of Special Conservation Concern, South Carolina State Wildlife Action Plan.
Kirwan, M. L., & Mudd, S. M. (2012). Response of salt-marsh carbon accumulation to climate change. Nature, 489(7417), 550–553.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11440
Klinges, D. H., Martin, C. W., & Roberts, B. J. (2025). Ecological associations of the coastal marsh periwinkle snail Littoraria irrorata: Field and laboratory evidence of vegetation habitat preferences. PeerJ, 13, e19071.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19071
Reed, D. J. (1995). The response of coastal marshes to sea-level rise: Survival or submergence? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 20(1), 39–48.https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290200105
Rietl, A. J., Sorrentino, M. G., & Roberts, B. J. (2018). Spatial distribution and morphological responses to predation in the salt marsh periwinkle. Ecosphere, 9(6), e02316.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2316
Rodriguez, R., & Epifanio, C. E. (2000). Multiple cues for induction of metamorphosis in larvae of the common mud crab, Panopeus herbstii. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 195, 221–229.https://doi.org/10.3354/meps195221
Silliman, B. R., Layman, C. A., Geyer, K., & Zieman, J. C. (2004). Predation by the black-clawed mud crab, Panopeus herbstii, in Mid-Atlantic salt marshes: Further evidence for top-down control of marsh grass production. Estuaries, 27(2), 188–196.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803375
Most beachgoers look across the shoreline and see a boundary.
The ocean ends. The land begins.
But the strip of sand where waves wash ashore and slide back toward the sea is not really either one. It is a threshold—a place that becomes ocean and land again with every passing wave.
At first glance, this narrow band of wet sand appears empty. There are no marsh grasses, no oyster reefs, and no obvious schools of fish. Yet beneath the surface, the sand is alive with animals digging, filtering, feeding, hunting, and breathing.
This is the swash zone: the constantly shifting seam between ocean and land.
It is one of the most overlooked ecosystems on the North Carolina coast.
The swash zone is the narrow strip of shoreline where waves wash ashore and then retreat back toward the sea. Though it may appear to be little more than wet sand, it supports a diverse community of animals adapted to life between ocean and land. | Image credit: J. Morales
The Beach That Never Stops Moving
Unlike a marsh, oyster reef, or seagrass meadow, the swash zone never stays still.
Each wave pushes seawater into the sand and then pulls it back out again. Water moves through the spaces between sand grains, carrying oxygen, microscopic algae, bacteria, and organic matter. The sand itself acts almost like a living filter, supporting communities of organisms adapted to conditions that change minute by minute (Brown & McLachlan, 2018; McLachlan & Defeo, 2018).
To survive here, animals must tolerate burial, shifting sediments, crashing waves, changing salinity, and predators arriving from both land and sea.
Few species can endure such instability.
Those that do are specialists (Defeo et al., 2009).
The Living Wave Riders: Mole Crabs and Coquina Clams
If you’ve ever noticed the wet sand suddenly shimmer or seem to move as a wave retreats, you’ve likely witnessed two of the swash zone’s most abundant residents.
Atlantic Mole Crabs (Emerita talpoida)
An Atlantic mole crab, in Surf City, NC, briefly exposed at the surface of the swash zone. Within seconds, these specialized crustaceans can bury themselves beneath the sand, where they spend most of their lives filtering food from the surf. | Image credit: johnnybirder, iNaturalist
Known locally as sand fleas, Atlantic mole crabs spend nearly their entire lives buried beneath the surface of the swash zone.
They are not true crabs. Instead, they belong to a group of highly specialized crustaceans adapted for life where waves break on the shore. Their bodies are smooth, streamlined, and shaped almost like a small bean. Using powerful rear legs, they can bury themselves in saturated sand in seconds (Abude et al., 2024).
When waves wash overhead, they extend feathery antennae into the water and filter microscopic plankton and organic particles from the surf (Abude et al., 2024).
Rather than remaining stationary, mole crabs occupy the constantly shifting swash zone, where food and oxygen are delivered by breaking waves. Their abundance makes them one of the most important food sources for shorebirds, fish, and ghost crabs (Abude et al., 2024).
Coquina Clams (Donax variabilis)
Sharing the same habitat is one of the most recognizable shells on Atlantic beaches.
Coquina clams are the tiny, brightly colored shells scattered across the tide line in shades of pink, yellow, purple, blue, orange, and white.
Most people only notice the shells.
The living animal beneath them is remarkably adapted to life in moving sand.
Coquinas live just beneath the surface of the swash zone where they filter microscopic algae and suspended particles from the water. As waves advance and retreat, they repeatedly rebury themselves, using a muscular foot to dig into the sand with astonishing speed (Ellers, 1995).
Like mole crabs, coquinas are adapted to the dynamic conditions of the swash zone. Their abundance provides food for fish, crabs, and shorebirds, making them a critical link between microscopic plankton and larger coastal predators (Wilson, 1999).
Standing at the water’s edge, it is easy to think the beach is motionless.
In reality, thousands of coquinas and mole crabs may be moving beneath your feet with every wave.
The Night Shift: Atlantic Ghost Crabs (Ocypode quadrata)
Higher on the beach, above the reach of most waves, another resident waits.
Atlantic ghost crabs spend daylight hours hidden inside deep burrows excavated into the sand. Their pale coloration blends almost perfectly with the beach, making them difficult to see unless they move.
Atlantic ghost crabs spend daylight hours hidden in burrows above the tide line. Their pale coloration provides excellent camouflage against the sand, making them surprisingly difficult to spot until they move. | Image credit: A. Mitchell
While the swash zone below is dominated by animals filtering food from the surf, ghost crabs are hunters and scavengers.
After sunset, they emerge to patrol the shoreline, feeding on mole crabs, coquina clams, stranded marine organisms, insects, carrion, and whatever other opportunities the beach provides (Wolcott, 1978).
Many beachgoers never see them at all. Instead, they notice the evidence they leave behind. Round burrow openings dot the upper beach. Fresh tracks crisscross the sand overnight and disappear with the next tide. Occasionally, a pale shape darts sideways through the beam of a flashlight before vanishing into darkness.
Those burrows tell a story of their own. Beaches with abundant ghost crab burrows often support richer communities of animals living both above and below the sand, which is why scientists sometimes use ghost crabs as one way of assessing beach condition and disturbance (Schlacher et al., 2016).
The next time you notice a round hole in the upper beach with a pile of freshly excavated sand nearby, you are likely looking at the entrance to a ghost crab burrow—and evidence that the beach is still very much alive after dark.
Between the Grains
The largest residents of the swash zone are only part of the story.
Beneath the surface lies an even larger community that most beachgoers never see. Between individual grains of sand are tiny water-filled spaces that form a hidden habitat known as the interstitial zone. To us, a handful of wet sand looks solid. To these organisms, it is an underwater landscape of tunnels, chambers, and passageways (Higgins & Thiel, 1988).
The beach is layered with hidden communities. From amphipods and ghost crabs higher on the shore to coquina clams and mole crabs at the water’s edge, different species occupy distinct zones shaped by waves, moisture, food availability, and shifting sand. | Image credit: Michel et al., 2016
Amphipods: The Cleanup Crew
The line of seaweed, shells, and debris left behind by the tide may look messy, but it is often one of the busiest places on the beach.
Hidden among the wrack, in the upper intertidal zone, are amphipods, small crustaceans often called Atlantic beach hoppers (Americorchestia longicornis). If you sift through a pile of damp seaweed or drift algae, you may catch a glimpse of them springing away before disappearing back into cover.
Much of what washes ashore eventually becomes food for something else. Amphipods feed on decaying seaweed, dead animals, and other organic material stranded by the tide. In doing so, they help break down material that would otherwise accumulate along the shoreline. They also become food themselves, supporting shorebirds, fish, and other invertebrates that forage along the beach (Dugan et al., 2003).
Polychaete Worms: Engineers Beneath the Sand
Most beachgoers never see the worms living beneath the tide line, but their work is happening constantly beneath the surface.
As polychaete worms burrow through the sand, they create tiny pathways that allow water and oxygen to penetrate deeper into the sediment. In many ways, they perform the same role that earthworms do in a garden, except their garden is the beach itself.
Some species spend their lives feeding on organic material trapped between the sand grains, such as Lugworms (Arenicolidae). Others hunt small crustaceans and worms moving through the sediment such as Bloodworms (Glyceridae) and Paddle Worms / Shimmy Worms (Nephtyidae). As they burrow, feed, and move through the beach, they continually mix the sand and help create conditions that allow countless other organisms to survive there (McLachlan & Defeo, 2018).
Ribbon Worms: Hidden Predators
Not every animal beneath the sand is feeding on algae, bacteria, or decaying material.
Ribbon worms (Nemertea) are predators, though few people ever realize they are there. Hidden beneath the surface, they hunt some of the same tiny animals that share the spaces between the sand grains, including small worms, crustaceans, and other invertebrates moving through the sediment (Thiel & Kruse, 2001).
Many possess a remarkable feeding structure called a proboscis that can be rapidly extended to capture prey (Thiel & Kruse, 2001).
Most beachgoers will never see a ribbon worm, yet they are part of the same hidden food web as the amphipods, copepods, and nematodes surrounding them. Even beneath a seemingly empty stretch of sand, animals are feeding, avoiding predators, and competing for resources every hour of the day.
Nematodes: Life at Microscopic Scale
If you could shrink yourself down and explore a handful of wet sand, the landscape would look very different.
What appears solid to us is actually filled with tiny spaces between the grains. Moving through those water-filled passages are microscopic animals called nematodes (phylum Nematoda).
These tiny roundworms feed on bacteria, algae, fungi, and organic matter coating the sand. Though nearly invisible, they are among the most abundant animals on many beaches and play an important role in breaking down organic material and recycling nutrients throughout the sediment (Coull, 1999; Schratzberger & Ingels, 2018).
Harpacticoid Copepods: Tiny Links in the Food Web
Sharing those same microscopic spaces are harpacticoid copepods (Paraleptastacus wilsoni), tiny crustaceans that spend their lives moving between individual sand grains.
They graze on algae and microbial films coating the sediment, feeding on resources too small for larger animals to use directly. In turn, they become prey for larger invertebrates and juvenile fishes.
Most beachgoers will never see a harpacticoid copepod. Yet every handful of wet sand may contain a community of animals like these, quietly connecting the microscopic world to the larger food web of the beach (Schratzberger & Ingels, 2018).
Individually, these animals are easy to overlook.
Collectively, they form much of the living foundation of the tide line. The coquinas, mole crabs, ghost crabs, fishes, and shorebirds visible along the shoreline all depend, directly or indirectly, on countless small interactions taking place beneath the sand.
Following the Birds
One of the easiest ways to observe this hidden ecosystem is not by looking down.
It is by looking up.Anyone who spends time on the beach has likely watched sanderlings (Calidris alba) racing along the edge of the surf. They dart forward as a wave retreats, stop suddenly to probe the sand, and then sprint away from the next incoming wave. A little farther up the beach, ruddy turnstones (Arenaria interpres) pick through wrack lines left behind by the tide. Along the surf edge, Eastern willets (Tringa semipalmata semipalmata) walk deliberately through the shallows, searching for movement beneath the water.
To many beachgoers, they are simply birds feeding along the shoreline.
What they are actually doing is reading the beach.
Each probe into the sand is a search for prey hidden beneath the surface. Mole crabs, small worms, amphipods, coquinas, and other invertebrates living within the tide line provide food for these birds (Dugan et al., 2003; Hubbard & Dugan, 2003).
The birds go where the food is.
When shorebirds gather along a stretch of beach, they are often revealing an ecosystem that would otherwise remain invisible. Their presence tells us that the sand beneath them is alive with prey, even if we cannot see it ourselves.
In many ways, shorebirds act as interpreters of the tide line. By watching where they feed, pause, and congregate, we gain a glimpse into the hidden community supporting them below.
Reading the Beach
From a distance, the tide line can seem almost empty. A narrow strip of wet sand separates the ocean from the rest of the beach. Waves arrive, waves leave, and little appears to change.
Spend a few minutes watching, however, and a different picture begins to emerge.
Shorebirds gather where the surf is most active. Tiny shells appear and disappear with the retreating waves. Fresh ghost crab burrows punctuate the upper beach. Even the wrack line left behind by the tide becomes a gathering place for scavengers and foraging birds.
What first appears to be a simple boundary between land and sea begins to look more like a busy shoreline neighborhood.
At first glance, the tide line can appear almost empty. Look a little longer, however, and the clues begin to emerge—feeding shorebirds, scattered shells, and the constant movement of the surf all hint at the hidden community living beneath the sand. | Image credit: A. Mitchell
The animals living here are responding to the same thing: the constant movement of the tide. Food arrives with the surf, becomes available for a brief moment, and is quickly claimed by whatever creature is best adapted to find it. Some filter it from the water. Some collect it from the sand. Others hunt the animals already feeding there.
Because these organisms live so closely tied to the conditions of the beach, changes in their numbers can provide clues about the habitat itself (Defeo et al., 2009). A shoreline where birds are feeding, ghost crab burrows remain active, and life continues to reveal itself at the edge of the surf is often a sign that this narrow strip of beach is supporting the community that depends upon it.
When those communities decline, the change may not be immediately obvious. Yet over time the beach can begin to feel quieter. Fewer birds stop to feed. Fewer burrows appear in the sand. The signs become harder to find. Those changes can ripple outward through the food web, affecting species both on the beach and beyond it (Peterson et al., 2006).
The Threshold
The next time you stand at the edge of the surf, watch where the waves pause before sliding back toward the sea.
It is easy to see this narrow strip of shoreline as a boundary. Ocean on one side. Land on the other.
But the tide line is not really a dividing line at all.
It is a place where both worlds meet.
With every passing wave, food, oxygen, and life arrive from the ocean. Beneath the sand, animals capture it, consume it, recycle it, and pass it on. Shorebirds search for it. Ghost crabs emerge after dark to hunt it. Countless organisms spend their entire lives within a space that is neither fully ocean nor fully land.
Most people walk across this strip of beach without ever noticing it.
Yet it is one of the busiest places along the coast.
The next time you see shells appearing and disappearing in the surf, a flock of sanderlings racing the tide, or ghost crab burrows scattered across the upper beach, remember that these are not separate observations. They are pieces of the same story.
What appears to be an empty stretch of wet sand is actually a living threshold—a place where ocean and land remain connected through countless interactions happening beneath every step.
And once you see it, it becomes difficult to look at the shoreline the same way again.
The tide line in Surf City, NC may appear to be little more than wet sand. Yet beneath every retreating wave lies a hidden community connecting ocean and land through countless interactions, most of them unseen. | Image credit: A. Mitchell
References
Abude, R. R., Lôbo-Hajdu, G., Moreira, D. A., & Cabrini, T. M. (2024). Sandy beach mole crabs (Decapoda: Hippidae: Emerita): A systematic review of the anthropic impacts, populations density, and conservation strategies. Marine Environmental Research, 202, 106745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106745
Defeo, O., McLachlan, A., Schoeman, D. S., Schlacher, T. A., Dugan, J., Jones, A., Lastra, M., & Scapini, F. (2009). Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: A review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 81(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.022
Dugan, J. E., Hubbard, D. M., McCrary, M. D., & Pierson, M. O. (2003). The response of macrofauna communities and shorebirds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beaches of Southern California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 58, 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7714(03)00045-3
Ellers, O. (1995). Behavioral control of swash-riding in the clam Donax variabilis. The Biological Bulletin, 189(2), 120-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/1542462
Hubbard, D. M., & Dugan, J. E. (2003). Shorebird use of an exposed sandy beach in Southern California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 58, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7714(03)00048-9
McLachlan, A., & Defeo, O. (2018). The ecology of sandy shores (3rd ed.). Academic Press.
P, H. R., & Thiel, H. (1988). Intro study meiofauna. Smithsonian Books (DC).
Peterson, C. H., Bishop, M. J., Johnson, G. A., D’Anna, L. M., & Manning, L. M. (2006). Exploiting beach filling as an unaffordable experiment: Benthic intertidal impacts propagating upwards to shorebirds. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 338(2), 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.06.021
Pilkey, O. H., Rice, T. M., & Neal, W. J. (2014). How to read a North Carolina beach: Bubble holes, Barking sands, and rippled Runnels. UNC Press Books.
Schlacher, T. A., Lucrezi, S., Connolly, R. M., Peterson, C. H., Gilby, B. L., Maslo, B., Olds, A. D., Walker, S. J., Leon, J. X., Huijbers, C. M., Weston, M. A., Turra, A., Hyndes, G. A., Holt, R. A., & Schoeman, D. S. (2016). Human threats to sandy beaches: A meta-analysis of ghost crabs illustrates global anthropogenic impacts. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 169, 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2015.11.025
Schratzberger, M., & Ingels, J. (2018). Meiofauna matters: The roles of meiofauna in benthic ecosystems. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 502, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2017.01.007
Thiel, M., & Kruse, I. (2001). Status of the nemertea as predators in marine ecosystems. Hydrobiologia, 456(1-3), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013005814145
Wilson, J. G. (1999). Population dynamics and energy budget for a population of Donax variabilis (Say) on an exposed South Carolina beach. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 239(1), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0981(99)00027-1
Wolcott, T. G. (1978). Ecological role of ghost crabs, Ocypode quadrata (Fabricius) on an ocean beach: Scavengers or predators? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 31(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(78)90137-5
Each March 14, mathematicians celebrate π — the constant that links the circumference of a circle to its diameter. But Pi Day in nature appears everywhere along the coast: in boundaries that curve back upon itself, in ripples spreading across still water, in the rounded mouth of a burrow, in the arcs traced by a turning tide. Along the coast, these circles and spirals reveal patterns in nature that emerge so often they begin to feel less like abstract mathematics and more like a language written into sand and water. The shoreline is not calculating anything deliberately, yet the same relationships appear again and again as tides move sediment, organisms grow, and currents redistribute energy. What looks at first like scattered shapes — a curved creek channel, a ring of crab pellets, the fivefold symmetry of a sea star — gradually reveals itself as part of a larger pattern. The coast is full of geometry, briefly visible each time the water recedes.
The Creek Writes in Curves
A tidal creek bends around the marsh edge behind Surf City, where vegetation and sediment redirect the flow of draining water. These shifting boundaries gradually guide channels into widening curves that reappear with each tide. | Photo credit: A. Mitchell
At the creek mouths behind Topsail Island, the marsh edge redraws itself each time the tide drains away. Water retreats through narrow runnels that refuse straight lines, bending around grass hummocks and soft ridges, leaving a fan of nested arcs etched into exposed mud. The channels widen as velocity drops, sediment settling in fractions that record the rate of energy loss, so the surface becomes a temporary map of fluid negotiation.
These curves appear wherever moving water gradually redistributes energy rather than releasing it abruptly. In tidal landscapes, vegetation and sediment interact with flow in feedback loops that reshape channels over time, producing curved drainage networks whose geometry reflects both plant resistance and water momentum (Kirwan & Murray, 2007; Temmerman et al., 2007; Murray & Paola, 1994). Across river basins and tidal creeks alike, these evolving paths often approach widening spiral-like patterns as flow repeatedly adjusts to the boundaries around it (Rodriguez-Iturbe & Rinaldo, 1998).
Foam left behind by the falling tide sometimes dries into thin white filaments that trace these curves for a few quiet minutes before collapsing, a temporary record of motion fixed long enough to be read.
The creek does not preserve a single spiral. Each tide erases and redraws the same proportional tendency. The form emerges not from design but from the repeated redistribution of energy through water and sediment.
Geometry in the Grass
Dense stands of Spartina alterniflora divide space through repeating stem spacing. This structure slows water movement and traps suspended sediment, linking plant growth to the gradual elevation of the marsh surface. | Photo credit: A. Mitchell
Along the marsh margin, stems of Spartina alterniflora divide space through incremental adjustment. Leaves diverge from one another at angles that reduce overlap, distributing light capture through the canopy in repeating offsets that resemble packing patterns seen throughout plant growth.
Experiments in plant development show that when new structures arise under simple inhibitory fields, spiral-like arrangements often emerge as stable growth solutions (Douady & Couder, 1996). These patterns are widely recognized in plant morphology, where spacing between leaves or stems tends to distribute light and nutrients efficiently through the canopy (Niklas, 1997).
In salt marshes, this spacing carries ecological consequences beyond plant structure. Vegetation alters local water flow, slowing currents and promoting the deposition of suspended sediments that gradually elevate the marsh surface (Bouma et al., 2009; Fagherazzi et al., 2013; Leonard & Luther, 1995).
Mud crab burrows often appear in clusters whose spacing echoes the density of surrounding vegetation, each opening maintaining just enough distance to avoid collapse into the next.
Spiral shell growth of the periwinkle snail follows a repeating geometric expansion, allowing the animal to grow while maintaining the same overall shape. | Photo credit: A. Mitchell
Marsh periwinkles climb these stems in staggered lines that mirror the spacing of the leaves, their positions shifting with the tide yet repeatedly settling into the same angular arrangement.
Across the marsh platform, geometry quietly mediates the relationship between plant growth and landscape formation.
Spheres at the Mouth of a Burrow
A mud crab burrow at the edge of marsh vegetation marks the boundary between sand, grass, and moving water where patterns of spacing emerge. | Photo credit: A. Mitchell
Along the upper edge of the beach where grasses begin to anchor the sand, small clusters of rounded pellets often surround the entrances to crab burrows. At first glance they resemble scattered grains or fragments of dry sediment, but kneeling close reveals a more deliberate pattern.
Each pellet forms as damp sand excavated from underground tunnels passes through the crab’s mouthparts before being pushed back to the surface (Lucrezi et al., 2009). As the grains are rolled and compressed together, they settle into rounded shapes before drying in the coastal wind.
Among all possible forms loose material might take, the sphere encloses volume while minimizing surface area — a principle known as the isoperimetric property. When damp sand is compacted from many directions, the grains naturally settle toward this configuration.
The crab does not deliberately engineer spheres; the physics of granular material does the work. Similar rounding appears wherever particles compress together, from bubbles forming in foam to droplets condensing in clouds.
Around the burrow entrance, the pellets accumulate in loose arcs or clustered rings marking the repeated path of excavation. Studies of mud and ghost crab burrowing show that these excavated pellets form characteristic surface patterns around burrow openings as crabs repeatedly transport sediment from their tunnels (Lim & Diong, 2003; Chan et al., 2006).
Within hours the pellets dry and crumble back into ordinary sand. By the next tide the pattern may vanish entirely, erased by waves or shifting grains. Yet while they last, these small spheres record the intersection of animal behavior, sediment physics, and geometry.
Fivefold Bodies in the Wrack
Sand dollars show pentaradial symmetry — a five-part body plan shared by many echinoderms. The familiar white “sand dollar” is the skeleton left behind after the animal dies. Living sand dollars are gray or brown and covered in tiny moving spines that allow them to feed and move through the sand. In North Carolina, collecting live sand dollars is illegal; only empty tests found on the beach may be taken.| Image credit: Suzanne Campbell-O’Rahilly
Along the wrack line, sea stars rest without a preferred direction, their five arms distributing contact evenly across wet sand. Pentaradial symmetry divides the body into five equal sectors, stabilizing locomotion and feeding while allowing regeneration to proceed without disrupting balance (Beadle, 1989).
A broken sea star missing an arm still preserves the angle of the remaining four. The body reorganizes around absence without abandoning its underlying symmetry.
Sand dollars flatten this same geometry into a disk etched with five petal-like openings across the shell surface. These structures guide water across respiratory tissues while reinforcing the skeleton against bending forces generated by waves and sediment movement (Ellers & Telford, 1992; Mooi & David, 1998; Telford, 1981).
In shallow swash zones, freshly uncovered sand dollars often rotate edgewise until resistance equalizes, their circular outlines turning slowly with each pulse of water.
The etched flower is neither ornament nor accident. It records the intersection of circulation and structural strength — a geometry recalculated as abrasion reshapes the shell and burial depth shifts with each surge.
Across many biological systems, similar proportional relationships appear when living structures must distribute forces or transport materials efficiently through tissue networks (Ball, 1999).
Structure Where Sand Breaks
Hard structure embedded in soft sediment creates pockets where currents slow and animals find shelter, turning smooth bottoms into complex habitat. | Photo credit: A. Mitchell
Beneath the surface where oyster shells, coquina fragments, and storm-scattered debris interrupt the sand, the bottom shifts from smooth sediment to broken relief. In these pockets of structure, octopuses occupy cavities narrow enough to seal with the mantle.
Field observations show that octopus dens occur most frequently within crevice-rich substrates where structural complexity provides refuge and leverage for movement and defense (Anderson et al., 2002). Small fish hover near the edges of these openings, maintaining circular perimeters that expand and contract with the reach of a hidden arm. Juvenile sheepshead pick along shell ridges in repeating passes, their feeding paths tracing arcs that mirror the curvature of the structure beneath them.
Within these shelters, the eight arms of an octopus function as semi-independent mechanical units whose forces combine into coordinated motion (Mather & O’Dor, 1991). Much of this control occurs locally within the arms themselves, allowing rapid adjustment as the animal navigates complex surfaces.
As currents pass through these cavities, suspended particles settle into protected depressions, feeding microbial films that alter oxygen exchange and nutrient cycling along the bottom boundary. Structural geometry therefore governs not only animal behavior but also the micro-distribution of material across the seafloor.
Spirals Carried Offshore
As a thin sheet of water drains across the sand, it splits into branching paths that curve and merge before disappearing. These temporary channels briefly record how moving water redistributes energy along the shoreline. | Photo credit: A. Mitchell
Outside the inlet bars, a drifting boat leaves a wake that separates into tightening vortices. Each eddy contracts as it rotates, conserving angular momentum while turbulence redistributes energy through surrounding water.
Similar rotating structures form within rip currents, where narrow jets of water moving seaward generate circulation cells that trap plankton and suspended particles (Feddersen, 2014; MacMahan et al., 2006; Thorpe, 2005).
Fluid motion often organizes into spiraling paths under these conditions, reflecting the conservation of momentum within rotating systems (Longuet-Higgins, 1969; Peregrine, 1976).
Foam left behind by receding breakers sometimes curls into arcs that briefly echo shell fragments scattered across the wash.
Schools of baitfish caught at the margins of these rotations may briefly organize into crescent formations before the structure dissolves.
Incoming waves arrive in layered packets because slightly offset frequencies overlap and reinforce one another. When multiple rhythms travel through the same body of water, their interaction produces envelopes of larger motion surrounding smaller oscillations (Longuet-Higgins, 1969).
From the deck of a small boat these envelopes pass as broad rises containing finer pulses, a hierarchy of motion that continuously reshapes sandbars and sediment pathways along the coast.
Circles the Water Keeps
A fish briefly touching the surface sends expanding rings across the water, one of the simplest expressions of circular motion in nature. | Photo credit: A. Mitchell
At creek mouths and along nearshore bars, circles appear and vanish faster than the eye can catalogue them. These expanding rings are among the simplest patterns in nature, appearing whenever energy spreads outward through still water.
A ripple expands from a falling drop, its edge widening until it meets another wave and dissolves into interference. The distance around that circle always exceeds the span across it by the same proportion — the constant mathematicians call π.
Circular motion governs more than surface ripples. Tidal creeks bend into loops where erosion and sediment deposition redistribute its momentum along the channel edges that gradually produce curved meanders (Phillips, 1977; Temmerman et al., 2007; Seminara, 2006).
Within these bends, suspended sediment slows and settles, forming point bars that redirect flow during the next tidal cycle.
Offshore, rotating eddies may close into temporary rings that trap plankton and organic particles before dissolving again (MacMahan et al., 2006).
The circle becomes a moving boundary that regulates exchange while it lasts.
Proportion in a Moving Margin
Sunlight reflecting across shallow ripples reveals the repeating wave patterns that constantly reshape coastal sand flats. | Photo credit: A. Mitchell
Across marsh edge, wrack line, and nearshore water, similar patterns recur because natural systems governed by energy exchange tend to converge toward stable configurations.
Spiral drainage, fivefold symmetry, clustered leaf spacing, rotating vortices, and circular ripples represent different expressions of the same negotiation between force and structure.
Across biological and physical systems, recurring proportional relationships often emerge because they minimize energetic cost while maintaining stability (Ball, 1999; Cross & Hohenberg, 1993; Rodriguez-Iturbe & Rinaldo, 1998).
As sediment accumulates or erodes and vegetation thickens or thins, these geometric tendencies alter water residence time, root exposure, and nutrient retention within the marsh (Fagherazzi et al., 2013).
Each tide crosses the boundary again.
And each time it does, the coast recalculates its proportions.
References
Anderson, R. C., Wood, J. B., & Byrne, R. A. (2002). Octopus senescence: The beginning of the end. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 5(4), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0504_02
Beadle, S. C. (1989). Ontogenetic regulatory mechanisms, heterochrony, and eccentricity in dendrasterid sand dollars. Paleobiology, 15(3), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300009428
Bouma, T. J., Friedrichs, M., Van Wesenbeeck, B. K., Temmerman, S., Graf, G., & Herman, P. M. (2009). Density‐dependent linkage of scale‐dependent feedbacks: A flume study on the intertidal macrophyte Spartina anglica. Oikos, 118(2), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16892.x
Chan, B. K., Chan, K. K., & Leung, P. C. (2006). Burrow architecture of the ghost crab Ocypode ceratophthalma on a sandy shore in Hong Kong. Hydrobiologia, 560(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1088-2
Cross, M. C., & Hohenberg, P. C. (1993). Pattern formation outside of equilibrium. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65(3), 851-1112. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.65.851
Douady, S., & Couder, Y. (1996). Phyllotaxis as a dynamical self organizing process part II: The spontaneous formation of a periodicity and the coexistence of spiral and whorled patterns. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 178(3), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1996.0025
Fagherazzi, S., Mariotti, G., Wiberg, P., & McGlathery, K. (2013). Marsh collapse does not require sea level rise. Oceanography, 26(3), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2013.47
Feddersen, F. (2014). The generation of Surfzone eddies in a strong alongshore current. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 44(2), 600-617. https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-13-051.1
Kirwan, M. L., & Murray, A. B. (2007). A coupled geomorphic and ecological model of tidal marsh evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(15), 6118-6122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700958104
Leonard, L. A., & Luther, M. E. (1995). Flow hydrodynamics in tidal marsh canopies. Limnology and Oceanography, 40(8), 1474-1484. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1995.40.8.1474
Lim, S. S., Tantichodok, P., & Yong, A. Y. (2011). Comparison of burrow morphology of juvenile and young adult Ocypode ceratophthalmus from sai Kaew, Thailand. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 31(1), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1651/10-3314.1
Longuet-Higgens, M. S. (1969). On the joint distribution of wave periods and heights. Journal of Marine Research, 27, 1-16.
Lucrezi, S., Schlacher, T. A., & Walker, S. (2009). Monitoring human impacts on sandy shore ecosystems: A test of ghost crabs (Ocypode spp.) as biological indicators on an urban beach. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 152(1-4), 413-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0326-2
Mather, J., & O’Dor, R. (1991). Foraging strategies and predation risk shape the natural history of juvenile Octopus vulgaris. Bulletin of Marine Science, 49(1-2), 256-269.
Mooi, R., & David, B. (1998). Evolution within a bizarre phylum: Homologies of the first echinoderms. American Zoologist, 38(6), 965-974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/38.6.965
Murray, A. B., & Paola, C. (1994). A cellular model of braided rivers. Nature, 371(6492), 54-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/371054a0
Philips, O. M. (1977). The dynamics of the upper ocean (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Rinaldo, A., & Levy, O. (1998). Fractal river basins: Chance and self-organization. Physics Today, 51(7), 70-71. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.882305
Seminara, G. (2006). Meanders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 554, 271-297.
Telford, M. (1981). Structural analysis of the test of echinoids. Zoomorphology, 98, 93-110.
Temmerman, S., Bouma, T., Van de Koppel, J., Van der Wal, D., De Vries, M., & Herman, P. (2007). Vegetation causes channel erosion in a tidal landscape. Geology, 35(7), 631. https://doi.org/10.1130/g23502a.1
A microscopic epic of drift, decision, and devotion
On a winter walk along a pier in Surf City, the boards are bleached pale by sun and salt. Wind threads through the pilings. Gulls cry over gray water. At your feet, on a beam that has known decades of tides, something clings.
It is no bigger than a fingernail—chalky white, ridged like a tiny volcano. Along this coast, it is often an ivory barnacle—Amphibalanus eburneus—one of the small architects that quietly carpet pilings, docks, and seawalls from Topsail Sound to the Cape Fear. You could scrape it away with the edge of a shell. You probably have, absentmindedly, a hundred times.
But this barnacle is not debris. It is a biography written in calcium.
It began as a drifting dot—an invisible life in a moving sea. It crossed currents. It tasted the chemistry of places. And then, once, it chose.
The choice was final.
Barnacles are among the few animals on Earth that get exactly one chance to decide where they will live. No revisions. No migrations. No second homes. The place where a barnacle settles becomes the place where it will eat, grow, reproduce, and die. Its entire life collapses into a single coordinate on the map of the shore.
To understand a barnacle is to understand what it means to commit.
Ivory barnacles cling to a rock | Photo credit: Ken-ichi Ueda
Drift
A barnacle’s life begins in motion.
After fertilization, barnacle embryos hatch into nauplius larvae—tiny, triangular forms equipped with beating appendages and a simple eye (Anderson, 1994). They rise into the plankton, where they may drift for days to weeks, feeding and growing as tides and currents carry them outward (Chen et al., 2014).
The first larval stage of a barnacle, called a nauplius, is free-swimming and distinguished by a set of “horns.” | Photo credit: Robert Bachand
They are not aimless. Even at this scale, nauplii respond to light, salinity, and gravity. They migrate vertically through the water column, riding layers of current like conveyor belts. Their world is vast and borderless—and lethal.
Most barnacles die here.
Nauplii are eaten by copepods, jellyfish, fish larvae, and filter-feeding invertebrates. Each pulse of water is a gauntlet. Survival depends on number: millions released so that a few may reach shore.
After several molts, the nauplius enters its final larval form: the cyprid.
A late larval barnacle stage, the cyprid, has a bivalved shell of chitin and glands in its first antennae that are used to cement itself permanently to a hard substrate. | Photo credit: Robert Bachand
This is no longer a feeding animal. It is a vessel of stored energy, built for a single task—finding a place to live (Aldred & Clare, 2008).
The cyprid does not eat.
A clock begins.
Much of what we know about this hidden stage comes from decades of work on a close coastal relative, the striped barnacle – Amphibalanus amphitrite—a warm-water barnacle that clings to pilings and boat hulls worldwide, and whose larvae have become a window into how barnacles read the sea.
The striped barnacle (Amphibalanus amphitrite) is a globally distributed, non-native barnacle species that can spread via biofouling. In North Carolina waters it may occur outside its historical native range, but it isn’t widely recognized as a documented invasive species causing major ecological disruption. | Photo Credit: South Australia Marine Lab
The Narrow Window
Now the barnacle is no longer drifting blindly. It swims with intent. The cyprid probes surfaces with specialized antennules, “tasting” the chemistry of rock, wood, shell, and steel. It detects microbial biofilms—thin living skins that signal a surface has been stable long enough to support life (Qian et al., 2007). It senses the presence of other barnacles. It avoids surfaces that feel wrong.
This sensory world evolved in seas that were chemically simpler.
Today, cyprids swim through waters laced with heavy metals, hydrocarbons, microplastics, antifouling compounds, and nutrient-driven microbial shifts. These pollutants alter biofilms, mask settlement cues, and interfere with larval sensory systems. What once read clearly as “home” now arrives as static.
In degraded waters, cyprids often hesitate. They probe and retreat. They circle without committing.
But the clock does not pause.
Depending on species and temperature, a cyprid has only days to a few weeks before its stored energy is exhausted (Aldred & Clare, 2008). Each hour of searching burns fuel. When reserves fall too low, three futures unfold.
Some larvae simply die in the plankton and sink.
Some make a desperate choice—cementing themselves to marginal or unstable surfaces.
Others respond to distorted cues and settle where survival is unlikely.
This is not a failure of instinct. It is a mismatch between ancient sensory logic and a changed sea.
Long before we notice a shoreline growing quieter, its future has already thinned in the plankton.
When the answer is yes, the barnacle performs one of the most irreversible acts in the animal kingdom.
It flips upside down.
Using its antennules, the cyprid secretes a permanent biological cement and glues its head to the surface (Kamino, 2016). This adhesive—among the strongest natural glues known—binds underwater to stone, metal, and polymer. Once cured, it cannot be undone.
There is no “testing.” No trial period.
This is the end of motion.
Within hours, the cyprid undergoes a radical metamorphosis. Its eyes degenerate. Its swimming limbs are restructured into feathery feeding appendages called cirri. Its body reorganizes around a new axis—rooted instead of free (Høeg & Møller, 2006).
The barnacle becomes architecture.
Many do not survive even this. Newly settled juveniles are grazed by small fish and invertebrates. Waves scrape them away before cement fully cures. The shoreline is littered with choices that did not last.
Those that remain begin to build something larger than themselves.
A Life Built Around the Tide
Most animals grow by addition. Barnacles grow by reinvention.
Shell plates rise around soft tissue, forming a fortress against wave impact, desiccation, and predation. Inside, muscles and organs reorganize to support a life of rhythmic feeding.
When submerged, the barnacle opens its opercular plates and unfurls its cirri—six pairs of jointed limbs that sweep the water in steady arcs. Each beat captures phytoplankton, detritus, and microcrustaceans (Southward, 2008).
Metabolism slows. Heat and salt concentrate. Time folds inward. Some intertidal barnacles endure body temperatures exceeding 40°C (104°F) and prolonged oxygen deprivation (Harley, 2008). They wait for the sea to return.
Each tide is both a threat and nourishment.
Anatomy of a barnacle. | Photo Credit: AnimalFact.com
Time in Shell
Barnacles record time the way trees do.
Their shells grow in increments, forming visible growth bands that reflect seasonal cycles and environmental stress (Crisp, 1989). Storms leave signatures. Cold winters slow deposition. Productive summers thicken walls.
A barnacle on a piling may live five, ten, even twenty years (Southward, 2008). It will experience thousands of tides, hundreds of storms, and uncountable shifts in salinity and temperature—without ever moving.
Where foraminifera archive ancient seas in sediment, barnacles archive living shorelines in calcium.
Barnacles occupy one of the most punishing habitats on Earth: the intertidal zone.
Here, organisms must withstand:
Wave forces exceeding hurricane winds
Repeated drying and rehydration
Rapid temperature swings
Salinity changes from rain and evaporation
Intense ultraviolet exposure
Few animals can survive here. Barnacles not only survive—they structure the place.
Every barnacle on this shore is the consequence of a single larval decision made weeks earlier in open water.
They stabilize surfaces. They retain moisture. They create crevices for algae, worms, snails, and juvenile crustaceans. They shape temperature gradients and water flow. They turn bare rock into habitat.
When settlement falters—when larvae cannot read the shore or run out of time—the architecture of the coast changes.
Bare rock expands. Algal communities shift. Grazers lose shelter. Predators lose prey. The intertidal simplifies.
A piling with fewer barnacles is not merely cleaner. It is quieter. Biologically poorer and less layered.
The Lesson in Shell
Return now to that single barnacle on the pier.
It has no eyes. It has never seen the ocean. It will never know the gull overhead or the human who pauses above it. And yet it has shaped its entire existence around this exact sliver of coast.
It did not choose perfectly.
Some barnacles settle too high and starve. Some attach where sand scours them away. Some cement themselves beside competitors that outgrow and smother them.
There is no guarantee.
Only the act of choosing.
In a world that prizes movement, flexibility, and endless revision, the barnacle offers a quieter philosophy:
At some point, life must become a place.
To belong is not to drift forever. It is to accept exposure. To endure storms. To open when the tide allows. To grow, layer by layer, into the shape of your ground.
Every barnacle on this coast is a monument to a single irreversible decision.
And the sea is full of them.
Bay barnacle, Amphibalanus improvisus, on a rock in the New River | Photo credit: Alina Michele, iNaturalist, 2022
References
Aldred, N., & Clare, A. S. (2008). The adhesive strategies of cyprids and development of barnacle-resistant marine coatings. Biofouling, 24(5), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010802256117
Anderson, D. T. (1994). Barnacles: Structure, function, development and evolution (1st ed.). Springer Dordrecht.
Chen, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, H., Matsumura, K., Wong, Y. H., Ravasi, T., & Qian, P. (2014). Quantitative Proteomics study of larval settlement in the barnacle balanus Amphitrite. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088744
Crisp, D. J. (1989). Tidally deposited bands in shells of barnacles and molluscs. Origin, Evolution, and Modern Aspects of Biomineralization in Plants and Animals, 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6114-6_8
Harley, C. D. (2008). Tidal dynamics, topographic orientation, and temperature-mediated mass mortalities on rocky shores. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 371, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07711
Høeg, J. T., & Møller, O. S. (2006). When similar beginnings lead to different ends: Constraints and diversity in cirripede larval development. Invertebrate Reproduction & Development, 49(3), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2006.9652204
Qian, P., Lau, S. C., Dahms, H., Dobretsov, S., & Harder, T. (2007). Marine Biofilms as mediators of colonization by marine Macroorganisms: Implications for antifouling and aquaculture. Marine Biotechnology, 9(4), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-007-9001-9
Southward, A. J. (2008). Barnacles: Keys and notes for the identification of British species. Field Studies Council. Yu, S., & Chan, B. K. (2020). Intergenerational microplastics impact the intertidal barnacle Amphibalanus Amphitrite during the planktonic larval and benthic adult stages. Environmental Pollution, 267, 115560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115560
How seagrasses and marsh grasses—and the animals within them—build the marshes of Onslow County
In Onslow County’s estuarine marshes, the best time to understand how the landscape works is when the water pulls back. As tides drain from creeks and shallow flats, patterns begin to emerge—where water lingers, where it moves easily, and where it hesitates. These patterns are not random. They reflect the combined influence of plants, animals, and sediments continually reshaping the boundary between land and sea.
Like the microscopic shells of foraminifera preserved in sediment, marsh and seagrass communities record environmental conditions. But unlike the past locked in mud, these systems are alive, constantly negotiated by plants, grazers, predators, and microbes.
From permanently submerged seagrass beds to the highest marsh edge, each elevation zone in Onslow County is maintained not just by vegetation, but by species that actively regulate growth, chemistry, and water flow.
Subtidal shallows: seagrass beds maintained by grazers
In the shallow, light-penetrated waters of the New River Estuary and protected soundside areas, seagrass beds form underwater meadows that stabilize sediments and provide nursery habitat for fish and invertebrates. Species present or expected in Onslow County waters include eelgrass (Zostera marina), shoalgrass (Halodule wrightii), and widgeongrass (Ruppia maritima) (Mallin, 2000; Orth, 1984).
Seagrass blades rapidly accumulate epiphytic algae and microbial films. Without constant grazing, this layer can block light and suppress photosynthesis. Amphipods, isopods, and small gastropods act as continuous maintenance crews, grazing epiphytes and preventing them from overwhelming the plants themselves (Orth & van Montfrans, 1984; Valentine & Duffy, 2006).
Experimental studies show that when these grazers are removed, seagrass condition declines even under favorable light conditions, demonstrating that plant survival depends as much on animal activity as on physical environment (Duffy et al., 2015). Beneath the canopy, burrowing worms and bivalves recycle nutrients and oxygenate sediments, preventing organic matter from accumulating around roots (Orth, 1984).
In this zone, seagrass persists because grazers keep blades clean and sediments breathable—a cooperative system built on constant biological upkeep.
Gammarus mucronatus, a common amphipod grazer on eelgrass | Photo credit: E. A. Lazo-Wasem, Yale Peabody Museum, 2013.
The low marsh edge: cordgrass shaped by snails and crabs
At the daily-flooded edge of the marsh, smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) dominates. This narrow fringe marks the boundary between open water and marsh interior, where erosion pressure is highest and stability matters most.
Left: Healthy smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) line the estuary edge in Surf City, NC. | Photo credit: A. Mitchell, 2022.Right: Salt marsh die-off from grazing stress by marsh periwinkle snails and reduced predation by crabs, such as blue crabs, can create bare mudflats. | Photo credit: By Esuglia at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=65794096
Cordgrass growth here is tightly regulated by the marsh periwinkle snail (Littoraria irrorata). These snails climb grass stems to avoid inundation and graze directly on living tissue, often intensifying damage by facilitating fungal infection. At high densities, periwinkle grazing can dramatically reduce cordgrass height and biomass, effectively mowing the marsh edge (Silliman & Zieman, 2001).
Marsh periwinkle snails (Littoraria irrorata) are a common sight on cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) in North Carolina | Photo credit: North Carolina Aquarium at Roanoke Island, 2018.
Unchecked grazing can destabilize the marsh platform—but periwinkles themselves are regulated by crabs, including blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus),fiddler crabs (Genus Uca), purple marsh crabs (Sesarma reticulatum), hermit crabs and other burrowing species. Crabs prey on snails, limiting grazing pressure and indirectly protecting cordgrass (Silliman et al., 2005).
Crabs also function as ecosystem engineers. Their burrows aerate sediments, relieve sulfide stress around plant roots, and improve tidal water movement through compacted soils (Bertness, 1985; Thomas & Blum, 2010). Where crabs are abundant, cordgrass grows taller and denser; where they are lost, marsh die-off can occur rapidly.
This zone persists through a trophic cascade: grass builds land, snails limit grass, and crabs keep the system in balance.
Mid-marsh: mussels and detritus processors reinforce the platform
Just upslope, where flooding becomes less frequent, plant communities shift toward mixtures that often include saltmeadow cordgrass (Spartina patens). Here, the ribbed mussel (Geukensia demissa) emerges as a key stabilizing force.
Saltmeadow cordgrass (Spartina patens) is an important marsh stabilizer that has higher productivity when it grows near ribbed mussel aggregations | Photo credit: Kristie Gianopulos
Ribbed mussels form dense clusters at the base of marsh vegetation, binding sediments with byssal threads and physically reinforcing marsh soils against erosion (Bertness, 1984). As filter-feeders, they concentrate nutrients by removing organic matter from tidal waters and depositing nitrogen-rich biodeposits directly into marsh sediments (Jordan & Valiela, 1982).
Ribbed mussels (Geukensia demissa) at the base of marsh vegetation | Photo credit: R. Bachand
Grasses growing near mussel aggregations exhibit higher productivity than those without mussels, demonstrating a strong facilitative relationship between animals and plants (Bertness, 1984). As vegetation senesces, detritivorous worms, insects, and microbial decomposers break down dead plant material, converting standing biomass into detritus that fuels food webs throughout the estuary (Mann, 1988).
The mid-marsh functions as a processing zone, reinforcing marsh structure while converting plant matter into usable energy.
High marsh: microbes that manage chemical stress
In the high marsh, dominated by black needlerush (Juncus roemerianus) and saltmeadow cordgrass (Spartina patens), flooding is limited to spring tides and storms. Prolonged exposure to air creates harsh soil conditions, including elevated salinity and sulfide accumulation.
Here, microbial communities play a central role. Sulfate-reducing and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria regulate sulfide concentrations that would otherwise become toxic to plant roots, while microbial decomposition controls nutrient availability under fluctuating oxygen conditions (Howarth & Giblin, 1983).
Beneath the marsh surface, soil microbes regulate decomposition, carbon exchange, and chemical stress. Changes in salinity and flooding reshape microbial communities, influencing how marsh soils process organic matter and support vegetation across tidal elevations. | Image credit: Zhang et al., 2023.
Small soil invertebrates maintain pore spaces that allow brief pulses of oxygenated water to penetrate during flooding. Unlike the visibly engineered low marsh, the high marsh is stabilized largely through biogeochemical regulation rather than grazing or predation.
This zone endures because microbes quietly buffer plants against chemical extremes.
From microbes in the soil to grasses at the surface, biological interactions drive marsh formation. Microbial processes govern decomposition and organic matter buildup, helping determine whether marsh platforms gain elevation, remain stable, or collapse | Image credit: Abbot, Quirk & Fultz, 2022.
The marsh–upland transition: keeping the boundary intact
At the uppermost margin of the marsh, tidal influence becomes intermittent and environmental stress shifts from salinity to erosion and freshwater input. Burrowing invertebrates increase soil permeability, allowing stormwater and tidal surges to infiltrate rather than scour the surface (Thomas & Blum, 2010).
A profile illustration . depicting the recommended transition of plant types from the edge of the salt marsh to the upland buffer. | Image credit: Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management
Vegetation root networks stabilize soils exposed to drying and wave action, while animal burrows act as pressure-release pathways during extreme events. When these biological processes are disrupted—by shoreline hardening or vegetation removal—the marsh edge often collapses abruptly rather than adjusting gradually.
This boundary holds only as long as water can move through it.
Black, organic-rich peat exposed after storms marks the remains of an ancient salt marsh once buried beneath barrier sands. Its reappearance along North Topsail Beach records long-term shoreline change and marsh migration. Photo credit: Bill Tresnan, 2024.
A marsh built by interactions
Across all elevations in Onslow County marshes, the pattern is consistent:
Plants define the zones—but animals and microbes determine whether those zones endure.
Conceptual diagram of revised juvenile blue crab ontogenetic habitat shifts. Arrows depict transitions between habitats with increases in size. Arrow widths denote abundance contributions of individuals between habitats. | Image credit: Hyman et al., 2023
From grazers that keep seagrass blades clean, to crabs that hold the marsh edge together, to microbes that manage invisible chemical stress, the marsh is sustained by small organisms with outsized influence. Together, these interactions determine not just what lives in the marsh, but whether the marsh itself endures.
Purple marsh crabs (Sesarma reticulatum) moving together along the marsh edge on South Topsail Island, North Carolina. Their collective movement and feeding activity illustrate how small organisms play outsized roles in maintaining marsh structure. Photo credit: A. Mitchell, 2025.
References
Abbott, K. M., Quirk, T., & Fultz, L. M. (2022). Soil microbial community development across a 32-year coastal wetland restoration time series and the relative importance of environmental factors. Science of The Total Environment, 821, 153359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153359
Bertness, M. D. (1984). Ribbed mussels and Spartina Alterniflora production in a New England salt marsh. Ecology, 65(6), 1794-1807. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937776
Bertness, M. D. (1985). Fiddler crab regulation of Spartina alterniflora production on a New England salt marsh. Ecology, 66(3), 1042-1055. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940564
Duffy, J. E., Reynolds, P. L., Boström, C., Coyer, J. A., Cusson, M., Donadi, S., Douglass, J. G., Eklöf, J. S., Engelen, A. H., Eriksson, B. K., Fredriksen, S., Gamfeldt, L., Gustafsson, C., Hoarau, G., Hori, M., Hovel, K., Iken, K., Lefcheck, J. S., Moksnes, P., … Stachowicz, J. J. (2015). Biodiversity mediates top–down control in eelgrass ecosystems: A global comparative‐experimental approach. Ecology Letters, 18(7), 696-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12448
Howarth, R. W., & Giblin, A. (1983). Sulfate reduction in the salt marshes at Sapelo island, Georgia. Limnology and Oceanography, 28(1), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1983.28.1.0070
Hyman, A. C., Chiu, G. S., Seebo, M. S., Smith, A., Saluta, G. G., Knick, K. E., & Lipcius, R. N. (2023). Model-based evaluation of critical nursery habitats for juvenile blue crabs through ontogeny: Abundance and survival in seagrass, salt marsh, and unstructured bottom. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.20.549877
Jordan, T. E., & Valiela, I. (1982). A nitrogen budget of the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa, and its significance in nitrogen flow in a New England salt marsh. Limnology and Oceanography, 27(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1982.27.1.0075
Mallin, M. A., Burkholder, J. M., Cahoon, L. B., & Posey, M. H. (2000). North and South Carolina coasts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 41(1-6), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-326x(00)00102-8
Mann, K. H. (1988). Production and use of detritus in various freshwater, estuarine, and coastal marine ecosystems. Limnology and Oceanography, 33(4part2), 910-930. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4part2.0910
Orth, R. J., Heck, K. L., & Van Montfrans, J. (1984). Faunal communities in seagrass beds: A review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator: Prey relationships. Estuaries, 7(4), 339. https://doi.org/10.2307/1351618
Orth, R. J., & Van Montfrans, J. (1984). Epiphyte-seagrass relationships with an emphasis on the role of micrograzing: A review. Aquatic Botany, 18(1-2), 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(84)90080-9
Silliman, B. R., Van de Koppel, J., Bertness, M. D., Stanton, L. E., & Mendelssohn, I. A. (2005). Drought, snails, and large-scale die-off of southern U.S. salt marshes. Science, 310(5755), 1803-1806. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1118229
Silliman, B. R., & Zieman, J. C. (2001). Top-down control of Spartina alterniflora production by periwinkle grazing in a Virginia salt marsh. Ecology, 82(10), 2830. https://doi.org/10.2307/2679964
Thomas, C., & Blum, L. (2010). Importance of the fiddler crab Uca pugnax to salt marsh soil organic matter accumulation. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 414, 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08708
Valentine, J. F., & Duffy, J. E. (n.d.). The central role of grazing in seagrass ecology. Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation, 463-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2983-7_20
Zhang, G., Bai, J., Jia, J., Wang, W., Wang, D., Zhao, Q., Wang, C., & Chen, G. (2023). Soil microbial communities regulate the threshold effect of salinity stress on SOM decomposition in coastal salt marshes. Fundamental Research, 3(6), 868-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2023.02.024
In the season of chilly tides and twinkling pier lights, the New River estuary doesn’t quiet down — it parties in its own salty way. So grab your cocoa, bundle up, and join us for a winter countdown of festive fins, feathers, and the ecological magic beneath the misty surface.
(Sing along if you dare — apologies in advance.)
Day 12: Twelve Dolphins Dancing
Bottlenose dolphins along the mid-Atlantic coast shift into cooperative foraging teams in the cooler months — synchronized movements that feel almost choreographed (Torres & Read, 2009). Their leaping, circling, and flipper-flicking tactics help herd fish just like dancers driving the story across a winter stage.
Cue underwater Nutcracker ballet.
Day 11: Eleven Stripers Schooling
Atlantic striped bass move into estuarine channels when the water cools, fueling popular winter fisheries (Boyd, 2011).
Cold water? Hot bite.
Day 10: Ten Blue Crabs Burrowing
Blue crabs overwinter right here — burrowed into sediment, metabolism slowed, waiting for spring, or when water temperatures rise above 9℃ (Glandon, Kilborn & Miller, 2019).
The ultimate cozy blanket fort.
Day 9: Nine Oysters Filtering
Oysters continue filtering water through the winter, though more slowly — still improving water quality and boosting biodiversity (Grabowski & Peterson, 2007).
Nature’s tiny elves never clock out.
Day 8: Eight Croakers Drumming
Atlantic croaker remain common in NC coastal waters during cooler months, shifting to deeper estuarine areas (Miller et al., 2003).
Rumble, rumble — underwater holiday percussion.
Day 7: Seven Specks Still Striking
Speckled seatrout stay active in winter, especially in deeper holes and marsh channels where prey concentrates and water temperatures remain above 7℃ (Ellis, Buckle & Hightower, 2017).
Even cold-blooded fish love a good holiday snack.
Day 6: Six Sharks Snow-Birding
Juvenile coastal sharks like sandbars and sharpnose depart estuaries in late fall, migrating offshore and southward (Bangley et al., 2018).
“See you after the thaw!”
Day 5: FIVE… OYS-TER REEFS!
Oyster reefs provide the essential winter housing market — structured refuge for juvenile fish, crustaceans, and invertebrates (Coen et al., 2007).
Deck the reefs with beds and breakfasts..
Day 4: Four Buffleheads Diving
These small sea ducks, buffleheads, arrive from the Arctic and forage in our coastal waters all winter long (Gauthier, 2014).
Feathered travelers escaping the Arctic freeze.
Day 3: Three Terrapins Burrowed
Diamondback terrapins overwinter in marsh sediments, lowering heart rate and waiting out the cold (Harden, Midway & Willard, 2015).
A brumation vacation.
Day 2: Two Menhaden Shoals
Atlantic menhaden form hugewinter schools offshore and near inlet mouths, fueling predator energy budgets (Orth, 2023).
The estuary’s holiday punch bowl.
Day 1: And a Red Drum in the Mar-sh-Tree
Red drum remain year-round, feeding in creeks and marsh edges even in winter low-temp slow-motion (Bacheler et al., 2009).
Our coastal Christmas (and state) mascot.
The Estuary Never Sleeps
Even as we wrap gifts and check lists twice, life beneath the cold surface hustles on — feeding, moving, filtering, and keeping the New River ecosystem healthy through the darkest season.
So here’s to the citizens of our winter waters — May your tides be merry and bright!
References
Bacheler, N., Paramore, L., Buckel, J., & Hightower, J. (2009). Abiotic and biotic factors influence the habitat use of an estuarine fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 377, 263-277. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07805
Bangley, C. W., Paramore, L., Dedman, S., & Rulifson, R. A. (2018). Delineation and mapping of coastal shark habitat within a shallow lagoonal Estuary. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0195221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195221
Boyd, J. B. (2011). Maturation, fecundity, and spawning frequency of the Albemarle/Roanoke striped bass stock (2011. 1510474) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Coen, L., Brumbaugh, R., Bushek, D., Grizzle, R., Luckenbach, M., Posey, M., Powers, S., & Tolley, S. (2007). Ecosystem services related to oyster restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 341, 303-307. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps341303
Ellis, T., Buckel, J., & Hightower, J. (2017). Winter severity influences spotted seatrout mortality in a southeast US estuarine system. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 564, 145-161. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11985
Glandon, H. L., Kilbourne, K. H., & Miller, T. J. (2019). Winter is (not) coming: Warming temperatures will affect the overwinter behavior and survival of blue crab. PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0219555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219555
Grabowski, J. H., & Peterson, C. H. (2007). Restoring oyster reefs to recover ecosystem services. Theoretical Ecology Series, 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1875-306x(07)80017-7
Harden, L. A., Midway, S. R., & Williard, A. S. (2015). The blood biochemistry of overwintering diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 466, 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2015.01.017
Orth, D. J. (2023). Fish, fishing and conservation. Blacksburg: Virginia Tech Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation.Torres, L. G., & Read, A. J. (2009). Where to catch a fish? The influence of foraging tactics on the ecology of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Florida Bay, Florida. Marine Mammal Science, 25(4), 797-815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2009.00297.x
When the red drum, flounder, and summer sharks follow the cooling tides offshore, Onslow County’s estuaries fall quiet. The flashy chases fade, and the splashes that once rippled through the creeks give way to stillness. But the story doesn’t end. Beneath November’s calm water, the estuary begins to rewrite itself.
The absence of its top hunters leaves behind both energy and opportunity — a banquet for the small and the overlooked. The currents no longer echo with the heavy pulse of pursuit. Instead, what remains is a more deliberate rhythm — a slow exchange between detritus, crabs, and the smaller fish that endure the cold months ahead.
Winter in the New River Estuary: The Vacancy in the Food Web
Every migration leaves an ecological vacancy. When red drum and southern flounder depart, they take with them both predatory pressure and nutrient export. The estuary briefly relaxes its guard. Prey fish, shrimp, and crabs experience a momentary release from predation from top predator populations that cause a cascade that momentarily alters predation pressure on lower-level prey (Clark et al., 2003).
In this lull, energy that once fueled apex biomass lingers in the system, stored in crustaceans and schooling fish that escaped the hunt (Baird et al., 1998). The estuary, ever adaptive, redistributes that energy downward. Blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) and juvenile spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) surge in number, exploiting the leftovers of summer’s feast (Allen et al., 2024). The marsh becomes a recycling ground — energy looping through smaller players instead of flowing outward to the sea.
Late-fall estuarine food web diagram showing energy flow from detritus to shrimp, fish, and mesopredators.
The Winter Guardians
But not all predators have gone. When the warm-water hunters leave, colder visitors arrive. Along the inlets and nearshore waters of Onslow Bay, Atlantic spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) drift in with the falling temperatures. They are the quiet inheritors of the season — small sharks with silver eyes and slate-gray backs, moving in disciplined schools just offshore.
Atlantic spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthius) — the “winter guardians” — patrol coastal waters when larger predators have departed, sustaining the rhythm of predation. | Photo credit: Andy Murch
Where the big sharks of summer — sandbars, blacktips, and bulls — have vanished southward or deeper, the dogfish remain. Their bodies are built for cold water, thriving where others slow (Carlson et al., 2014). And while their size may not inspire awe, their purpose is no less vital: they fill the empty seats at the top of the table.
Dogfish are mesopredators, but in winter they act as temporary apex hunters, patrolling the inlet and inner shelf where menhaden, herring, and squid still linger (Carlson et al., 2014). Their presence keeps the ecosystem in motion. They thin out the schools that might otherwise explode in number, preventing imbalance and decay. Like patient custodians, they maintain the continuity of predation, ensuring that energy continues to flow up and down the food web even in the cold months (Prugh et al., 2009).
In their absence, the estuary might collapse inward — prey would overgraze, detritus would pile, and oxygen would vanish from the mud. But the dogfish, efficient and tireless, keep the waters breathing.
Crabs and Killifish Take the Stage
Blue crabs roam the winter marsh, feeding on detritus and benthic invertebrates. Their slow foraging helps recycle nutrients and sustain the estuary’s energy balance through the cold season.
Within the estuary itself, the smaller actors continue their work. By December, the New River’s mudflats and marsh creeks host a quieter cast — mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus), sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon variegatus), and grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio). These resident species, often unnoticed, now carry the estuary’s metabolism on their backs.
They thrive on detritus and microbial mats, converting decay into new life (Kneib, 2015). Blue crabs roam like slow-moving janitors, shifting through sediment to feed on worms and organic matter (Kennedy & Cronin, 2007). Each movement releases trapped nutrients, fueling microbial blooms that will later nourish the first plankton of spring.
While the spiny dogfish patrol the edges of the continental shelf, these smaller species sustain the inner heart of the estuary. Their labor keeps the water alive long after the glamour of migration fades.
Nutrient Loops and Winter Stability
Without large predators, the estuary depends on microbial and detrital loops to keep its energy cycling. Up to 70% of carbon transfer between November and February occurs through benthic detritivory and microbial remineralization rather than direct predation (Friedrichs & Perry, 2001).
This invisible economy sustains the overwintering fish and crustaceans — the leftovers that, in time, will become the first meal of spring’s returning predators. It’s the estuary’s savings account: energy stored as biomass and sediment, ready to be withdrawn when the tides warm again.
When winter quiets the hunt, the estuary turns inward. Instead of predators driving the cycle, nutrients move through the mud itself — microbes and detritivores recycling what’s left behind. This unseen flow keeps the New River alive until spring’s return (adapted from Erler et al., 2020).
A Resilient Feast
By January, the estuary seems dormant to the casual eye, but beneath its glassy surface, life reorganizes with quiet precision. Crabs clean the table. Dogfish patrol the edge. Minnows and shrimp sift through the silt for remnants of summer.
The New River continues to breathe — slower, deeper, deliberate. When the big fish return with the first warm tides, the table is set once more, and the energy once left behind has been transformed — recycled through countless small mouths and patient currents into the promise of another season’s chase.
References
Allen, D. M., Govoni, J. J., Able, K. W., Buckel, J. A., Hale, E. A., Hilton, E. J., Kellison, G. T., Targett, T. E., Taylor, J. C., & Walsh, H. J. (2024). Long-term dynamics of larval and early juvenile spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) off the U.S. East Coast: Relating ocean origins, estuarine Ingress, and changing environmental conditions. Fishery Bulletin, 122(4), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.7755/fb.122.4.3
Baird, D., Luczkovich, J., & Christian, R. (1998). Assessment of spatial and temporal variability in ecosystem attributes of the St marks national wildlife refuge, Apalachee Bay, Florida. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 47(3), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1998.0360
Carlson, A. E., Hoffmayer, E. R., Tribuzio, C. A., & Sulikowski, J. A. (2014). The use of satellite tags to redefine movement patterns of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) along the U.S. East Coast: Implications for fisheries management. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e103384. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103384
Clark, K. L., Ruiz, G. M., & Hines, A. H. (2003). Diel variation in predator abundance, predation risk and prey distribution in shallow-water estuarine habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 287(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0981(02)00439-2
Foster, S. Q., & Fulweiler, R. W. (2014). Spatial and historic variability of benthic nitrogen cycling in an anthropogenically impacted Estuary. Frontiers in Marine Science, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2014.00056
Friedrichs, C. T., & Perry, J. E. (2001). Tidal Salt Marsh Morphodynamics: A Synthesis. Journal of Coastal Research, (27), 7-37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25736162
Kennedy, V. S., & Cronin, L. E. (2007). The blue crab: Callinectes Sapidus. Maryland Sea Grant College University of Maryland.
Kneib, R. T. (1986). The role of Fundulus heteroclitus in salt marsh trophic dynamics. American Zoologist, 26(1), 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/26.1.259
Prugh, L. R., Stoner, C. J., Epps, C. W., Bean, W. T., Ripple, W. J., Laliberte, A. S., & Brashares, J. S. (2009). The rise of the Mesopredator. BioScience, 59(9), 779-791. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.9.9
When the sun sets behind the dunes and the surf begins to whisper, pale shapes flicker across the sand. Their movements are quick, darting, and silent – like apparitions under moonlight. These aren’t the spirits of shipwrecked sailors but the true “ghosts” of our Carolina coast: Atlantic ghost crabs (Oxypode quadrata).
Atlantic ghost crab (Oxypode quadrata) | From iNaturalist
Living Between Worlds
Ghost crabs live in that liminal zone between land and sea – not quite aquatic, not quite terrestrial. They spend most daylight hours deep inside burrows up to four feet long, spiraling down in the cool, moist sand where they can keep their gills damp (Lucrezi & Schlacher, 2014).
At night, they emerge to feed and patrol their territories. Their footprints – delicate, zigzagging tracks across the high tide line – are often the only sign they’ve been there. Scientists describe O. quadrata as a “semi-terrestrial” species, adapted to breath air while still depending on water for respiration (Lucrezi & Schlacher, 2014). Each burrow is unique, shaped like a J or L., with a single opening and a smooth rim that the crab maintains meticulously (Strachan et al., 1999). It’s both a refuge from predators and a fortress against the summer sun.
Ghost crab footprints | From UF/IFAS Extension Escambia County
Predators and Predators’ Prey
Despite their spectral charm, ghost crabs are voracious predators. They scavenge for dead fish, clams, and organic debris but will actively hunt small invertebrates and even sea turtle hatchlings (Wolcott, 1978; Call et al., 2024).
In many coastal ecosystems, ghost crabs are top invertebrate consumers, linking marine and terrestrial food webs by recycling nutrients back into the sand (Wolcott, 1978). Yet their own lives are precarious – shorebirds, raccoons, and even humans are a constant threat. A study in Virginia found that burrow abundance correlated with temperature and habitat type, showing how these crabs respond to subtle environmental shifts (Call et al., 2024). They’re not just scavengers – they’re indicators of a beach’s health.
The Science of the “Ghost”
There’s a reason they earned their spectral reputation. Their translucent shells and lightning-fast reflexes make them appear and vanish like spirits. In low light, the fine grains of sand reflecting off their bodies amplify that effect – a built-in camouflage evolved for moonlit hunting. Can you spot them in the images below?
Ghost crabs also possess 360-degree vision from their elevated eye stalks, allowing them to spot threats in any direction (Lucrezi & Schlacher, 2014). And if the idea of “haunted sounds” intrigues you, here’s a Halloween twist: they “growl” by grinding their internal stomach plates – a process called stridulation – to warn off intruders. The sound, faint but distinct, echoes eerily under the dunes.
Ghosts of Onslow County
If you’ve ever walked Topsail Beach under a full moon, you’ve probably seen them: glowing white blurs racing sideways across your flashlight beam. (It’s best to use red or blue light as you search for ghost crabs and sea turtles.) Locally, these crabs are essential dune engineers. Their burrows aerate sand, help control organic decay, can reduce erosion, and maintain the delicate balance between dry and wet zones of the shore.
Ghost crab at night | From iNaturalist
You might wonder: since ghost crabs dig deep into the sand, do their burrows stabilize the beach and help fend off erosion? The answer is – sometimes, but not always.
You don’t even need to see a ghost crab to know it’s there – just look for the telltale burrow holes scattered along the upper beach. Each one marks a crab’s hiding place, and scientists often estimate ghost crab populations by counting burrow openings rather than the crabs themselves (Call et al., 2024; Lucrezi & Schlacher, 2014). The more holes you find, the healthier the local population – assuming the beach hasn’t been compacted or disturbed by human traffic.
Ghost crab holes near the dunes in the Outer Banks | From OuterBanks.com
Ghost crabs don’t just dig- they reshape their sandy underworld. Their burrows loosen compacted sediments, which can lower resistance to wind and wave forces (Rinehart et al., 2024). In some species, burrowing stabilizes surface flows, but in ghost crab systems the effect is less predictable – sometimes helping, sometimes hindering.
Unfortunately, they’re also victims of human disturbance. Coastal development, trampling, beach renourishment, and nighttime beach driving can collapse burrows and disrupt populations (Costa, Madureira & Zalmon, 2018). During the COVID-19 lockdown, researchers noticed ghost crab populations rebounding on urban beaches – a reminder that these “ghosts” return quickly when given peace (Costa et al., 2022).
The Real Spirits of the Shore
So this Halloween, as you wander along the moonlit sands of Onslow County, remember that the pale forms darting ahead of your footsteps aren’t apparitions – they’re guardians of the dunes, keeping our coasts breathing and balanced.
Every footprint, every scuttle, every faint rustle beneath the stars tells a story of adaptation and resilience. Ghost crabs may look like specters, but they’re among the most living, vital spirits of the beach.
“They vanish without a trace…except for their tracks.” – A. Mitchell
References
Antunes, G. D., Do Amaral, A. P., Ribarcki, F. P., Wiilland, E. D., Zancan, D. M., & Vinagre, A. S. (2010). Seasonal variations in the biochemical composition and reproductive cycle of the ghost crab Ocypode quadrata (Fabricius, 1787) in southern Brazil. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology, 313A(5), 280-291. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.593
Call, M. N., Pongnon, R. S., Wails, C. N., Karpanty, S. M., Lapenta, K. C., Wilke, A. L., Boettecher, R., Alvino, C. R., & Fraser, J. D. (2024). Biotic and abiotic factors affecting Atlantic ghost crab (Ocypode quadrata) spatiotemporal activity at an important shorebird nesting site in Virginia. PLoSONE, 19(8), e0307821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307821
Costa, L. L., Machado, P. M., Barboza, C. A., Soares-Gomes, A., & Zalmon, I. R. (2022). Recovery of ghost crabs metapopulations on urban beaches during the COVID-19 “anthropause”. Marine Environmental Research, 180, 105733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105733
Costa, L. L., Madureira, J. F., & Zalmon, I. R. (2018). Changes in the behaviour of Ocypode quadrata (Fabricius, 1787) after experimental trampling. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 99(5), 1135-1140. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315418001030
Gül, M. R.(2019). Energetic Consequences of Human Impacts for Bioindicator Atlantic Ghost Crab (Ocypode Quadrata). (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5460
Lucrezi, S., & Schlacher, T. A. (2014). The ecology of ghost crabs. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 201-256. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17143-5
Rinehart, S. A., Dybiec, J. M., Walker, J. B., Simpson, L., & Cherry, J. A. (2024). Effects of burrowing crabs on coastal sediments and their functions: A systematic meta‐analysis. Ecosphere, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4927
Strachan, P. H., Smith, R. C., Hamilton, D. A., Taylor, A. C., & Atkinson, R. J. (1999). Studies on the ecology and behaviour of the ghost crab, Ocypode cursor (L.) in Northern Cyprus. Scientia Marina, 63(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.1999.63n151
Wolcott, T. G. (1978). Ecological role of ghost crabs, Ocypode quadrata (Fabricius) on an ocean beach: Scavengers or predators? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 31(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(78)90137-5
